linucs@lemmy.ml to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 28 days agoIs there an historical reason why female formal dresses have a huge variety of styles compared to male ones where the only acceptable style is jacket with pants?message-squaremessage-square49fedilinkarrow-up1150arrow-down14file-text
arrow-up1146arrow-down1message-squareIs there an historical reason why female formal dresses have a huge variety of styles compared to male ones where the only acceptable style is jacket with pants?linucs@lemmy.ml to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 28 days agomessage-square49fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareinfinitevalencelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up44·28 days agohttps://youtu.be/uAKMolRKphE?si=T7SS0saI_GFQtdrj Derek Guy breaks it down some in this podcast. But it was a shift in the house of commons in England as it was working Man’s clothing and was a way to signal you were with the people and not aristocracy.
minus-squareCall me Lenny/Leni@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·28 days agoBoy did that work out.
https://youtu.be/uAKMolRKphE?si=T7SS0saI_GFQtdrj
Derek Guy breaks it down some in this podcast. But it was a shift in the house of commons in England as it was working Man’s clothing and was a way to signal you were with the people and not aristocracy.
Boy did that work out.