• whithom
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 days ago

    You’re half right. It shouldn’t be allowed to happen at all. Personally I think, one person, one house—that’s it. Corporations can’t own SFH. Taxed on empty units, taxed on high rates.

    • bountygiver [any]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      yup tax on empty units in general would help a lot including rent prices, if you want to not pay the extra tax, better lower your rent to a point people can afford. So the tax needs to be high enough for this decision to be made.

    • iii@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Personally I think, one person, one house

      What’s a family to do?

      • comfy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 days ago

        I’m guessing they mean maximum one person one house, so a person can’t own two houses but many people can choose to live in one house.

      • whithom
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        Obviously you have a house for your baby 🙄