A fair concern. It’s no peer reviewed research article that’s for sure, but it was somewhat news to me and may be to others who likewise did not know and/or needed to hear it.

“News” here meaning from an authoritative source (though I did not confirm that this person even so much as exists, much less is actually a climate scientist) and bringing information that is not trivially already known to the audience.

A lot of the “news” focuses on the tipping point (to be able to reverse the effects of climate change), thus leaving a gap between that vs. what we are now desiring more to know: just how fucked are we all?

But if it needs to be removed, that’s okay with me - I don’t want to mess up the community’s implementation of the rules.