• dinrenBanned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    Removed by mod

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      It’s actually not that vague looking into it. They have to be readily identifiable. They can totally wear masks as long as their identifiable as police and not trying to disguise themselves. So things like SWAT and riot equipment already identify them as police.

      It has an exemption for undercover officers, which already have existing requirements and paperwork associated for oversight. There is zero reason for any other officer to not be identifiable.

      It requires intent to disguise, so effectively this just outlaws plainclothes officers, which should already not be allowed honestly. Too easy for them to escalate a conflict from within to then justify an escalated police response. Protesters aren’t violent enough? Send Jeff and Bobby inside in plain clothes to start some shit.

      • dinrenBanned
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        23 days ago

        Removed by mod

        • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          26 days ago

          It would be illegal for the govt to do so I guess. Why would it be legal for the org to do it if it’s specifically prohibited for individual officers?

          The law should bind everyone, including the government.

          • dinrenBanned
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            23 days ago

            Removed by mod

    • ExtantHuman@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      Everything sounds vague if you only read the headline about it, and not the actual law

      • dinrenBanned
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        23 days ago

        Removed by mod

    • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      26 days ago

      And it would have to be enforced which it won’t. Democrat do nothing while pretending to do something shit again.

      • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        26 days ago

        It would be a state law. Dems in CA are much more likely to make sure it gets enforced compared to the federal level.

        • dinrenBanned
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          23 days ago

          Removed by mod