• PhiloBanned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Removed by mod

    • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I mean … the article is literally what it’s about.

      You’re being downvoted because you’re being a cynical contrarian.

      • PhiloBanned
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        37
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Removed by mod

        • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          2 years ago

          Saying nothing will ever work ever and nothing is ever good is not being skeptical.

          The article you’re commenting on is the citation, you’re being cynical and acting in bad faith.

          People disagree with you, I’d wager if you used a little more tact you might have more reasonable discussion.

          • PhiloBanned
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            25
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Removed by mod

            • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              2 years ago

              Not in our lifetime, nor the lifetime of our children or grandchildren. And it is almost a certainty not to be ever in the lifetime of man.

              Sure sounds like never.

              • PhiloBanned
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                17
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Removed by mod

                • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Ah right, you left open the possibility that maybe in a billion years it might work. You sure got us. Fuck off.

                  • PhiloBanned
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    16
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Removed by mod

            • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              I am not saying anying will never work

              “And it is almost a certainty not to be ever in the lifetime of man.”

              Let’s just sliiiiide those goalposts a few hundred more feet huh?

              • PhiloBanned
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                13
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Removed by mod

            • kbotc@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              Why will a tokamak never work, exactly? We’ve been running fusion experiments in them for 60 years and have a pretty good idea that we can make one big enough to produce power. We’re just baby stepping through the work so we don’t build a $30 billion dollar power plant that’s missing a design element.

              K-DEMO, JT-60, DEMO, CFETR, STEP, and the US DoE’s planned reactor suggest a high level of confidence that the science is already there. It’s just an engineering problem, much like the nuclear bomb in 1935.

    • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 years ago

      That’s because your comment is on a post that is literally one of the sources you’d get. More efficiency, overcoming total input, making it a generator, etc are all ancillary.