• pearsaltchocolatebar
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    7 months ago

    Actual lobbying is a good thing. This is just bribery pretending to be lobbying.

    • reddwarf@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      I strongly disagree. All lobbying is wrong and could be considered bribery. At a minimum it is circumventing democracy. We see a case in front of us and see what happens in broad daylight, what you call bribery. Do you honestly belief this is a rare case or can we say this (lobbying) is not a transparent part of the process and thus an incentive to bribe/coerce politicians?

      But I understand that the system is what it is atm and lots of people have been accustomed to it, up to the point of defending it.

      • pearsaltchocolatebar
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        You dont understand what actual lobbying is.

        Real lobbying is simply educating policy makers on the change you want to happen. You can’t reasonably expect every politician to be educated on every issue.

        For example, my SO lobbied the state legislature about a bill that would keep parents out of prison for non-violent offenses.

        Again, we’re talking about bribery masquerading as lobbying.

        • reddwarf@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          I know what lobbying is and what forms it can take. In the end it is all about influencing a political system by bypassing the electorate.

          Lets take this statement of yours:

          “Real lobbying is simply educating policy makers on the change you want to happen. You can’t reasonably expect every politician to be educated on every issue.”

          And this is why you should have a well working and functioning government. Politicians are elected and should have a global idea on what to do for the populace, they elected them after all. The knowledge you refer to should not be completely on these politicians. They might have some, based on their life experiences and education. The continuity and knowledge should come from civil servants. They are the cement of government, the persons who make the wheels go around. Ok, cement and wheels do not go well together but you get the gist of it.

          Listen, we are (or soon very likely) going around in circles. I understand that the current system of lobbying is what people know and expect, even rely on, see your example of your SO. Of course you see the benefit of a system which is used for centuries, millennia perhaps even. It is, in my view, a broken and infectious system, meant to overrule the will of the people. Brought to you by powers that want continuous access and influence in a government but in the disguise of “being helpful”.

          I don’t know what to say or how to explain it anymore then I already did.

          • pearsaltchocolatebar
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Any system will be abused, that’s just human nature, but that doesn’t invalidate the system as a whole.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Lobbying by definition can be verbal. However lobbying law allows for financial contributions as long as they’re disclosed. That’s what they’re speaking against. It legally puts the power of our government in the hands of those with the deepest pockets.