• @pearsaltchocolatebar
    link
    -1315 days ago

    He should have been disqualified. The photo contest was specifically for AI generated images.

    Categories on competitions exist, and if you enter something outside of that category, it should be disqualified.

      • @dogsoahC@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        115 days ago

        What is the point then? (Sorry if it’s explained in the linked article, I don’t have time to read that rn, maybe later.)

        • @ReiRose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          1115 days ago

          The point the photographer claims they were making is that real is better than AI and creatives are better than programs.

          • @dogsoahC@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            315 days ago

            Okay, then I get what it was for as a protest. But as for the photographer being disqualified… yeah? Makes sense? Not that having an AI competition makes any sense to begin with, though.

    • foremanguy
      link
      fedilink
      2015 days ago

      “He should have been disqualified.” Right, he was.

      But if he just posted it on a “normal” contest do you think that he could say such this message? No one would care and he would just be a random participant…

      • @pearsaltchocolatebar
        link
        315 days ago

        The contest wasn’t whether real pictures were better than AI pictures. The point they’re making is irrelevant.

        This is like submitting a home made pie to a ‘best restaurant pie’ contest. Yeah, the home made pie might be better, but that’s not the point of the competition.

        • foremanguy
          link
          fedilink
          214 days ago

          We agree on the point that it’s not the point of the competition and that’s alright that he was disqualified, BUT it’s a great move (like have done the AI into real art) to show that real arts could always be as good as AI ones!