• delirious_owl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yes. And then you’re obligated to give the source code too.

    • sunstoned@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      You would be obligated, if your goal were to be complying with the spirit and description of open source (and sleeping well at night, in my opinion).

      Do you have the source code and full data set used to train the “open source” model you’re referring to?

      • delirious_owl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I mean you would be legally obligated. You can sue someone who uses the GPL and doesn’t provide their sources.

        • sunstoned@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Do you plan to sue the provider of your “open source” model? If so, would the goal be to force the provider to be in full compliance with the license (access to their source code and training set)? Would the goal be to force them to change the license to something they comply with?