• some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I agree, but I also think there ought to be a punitive aspect when dealing with murder. If you take someone out of society, I think you lose the right to participate in society. The truly difficult thing is getting fair trials. There are too many people bullied into accepting plea deals, innocents who are locked up to avoid the death penalty. But with an open and shut case like this? Lock him away. He stole four people from their families.

      • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        There’s no evidence that what feels good to you actually reduces the odds of the perpetrator committing crimes again or reduces the rate of those crimes in society in general, and good evidence that what doesn’t feel good to you does those things. So you will have to decide if you would rather feel good about how the person who did something wrong was punished or have less crime in your society.

        • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          For absolutely known murder with no possibility of mistaken identity (a school shooter caught on camera and captured on the scene, for example), I am ok with vindictive punishment. Kill multiple people, lose your freedom. Live in a cage for the next sixty years. That’s the level of proof that I need for guilt-free incarceration.

    • ravhallBanned
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      2 years ago

      Oh, this kid needs to get shot. Same with his father. We can skip the “rehabilitation” for mass murderers and the people who made/support them.