• PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah I plan to drive my Corolla shitbox into the ground. The only problem with my plan is that the earth will only be around for a few hundred million years. Maybe a few billion? And (as long as you do the maintenance on time) Corollas will last until the heat death of the universe.

  • SSUPII@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    1 year ago

    Its sad. I LOVE the concept of smart devices, the fact that you can do things so much more conveniently with little interaction. They can absolutely be done without being privacy nightmares, but apparently companies are not interested in that.

      • BruceTwarzen@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        55
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t care about my data. I have nothing to hide. Haha they can have my data if they want.

        Literally everyone i know

        • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re missing the larger point. You dont have to have anything to hide for it to be an issue. They can now blackmail you for things they know about you, track you, use targeted advertising, listen in on your conversations. Hell, if there was a need to make you look guilty of a crime, with all the data on you, it wouldn’t be that difficult to do.

          Doesn’t even get into the issues of fighting back against oppressive government, which isnmuch more difficult to do if they’re constantly spying on you.

          But, you’re right, nothing to hide, so it’s not a big deal I guess.

            • demlet@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              Also, as long as people perceive it as a net benefit they’ll put up with all kinds of privacy invasions. Being part of a society is always a tradeoff of certain liberties for certain securities.

            • Demuniac@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Just you wait until insurance companies start charging you extra because you go to McDonalds once a month, or because you drive 5 miles over the speed limit sometimes. Or your ex wants revenge and pays someone on the dark web to get dirt on you so you lose custody of your kid. So much stuff can go wrong, and we shouldn’t take it lightly.

              If you think you have nothing to hide, you’re not using your imagination enough.

            • HidingCat@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              This place (the fediverse) is a circle-jerk of FOSS and paranoid privacy nuts: This comment has been a sane reference point.

              I feel like one of the issues is that there’s just no good regulations on data. I don’t mind the ideals behind some of the things that are happening (better ads for Internet tracking, better designs from data derived from the telemetry in cars), but much of this doesn’t have the same kind of regulation compared to say, medical data, which makes trusting these companies with the data very hard.

        • Wahots@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Then they act all butthurt when they get debt collectors harassing them on social media, or repos using location data to repo a car with missed payments, lol. All the J6 people are a great example of people fucking around with tech and committing crimes, then finding out belatedly :)

          There’s lots of good, non-crime reasons why you might wanna protect your personal data, so you don’t get your identity stolen, your wife thrown in jail for an accidental pregnancy, or being any flavor of queer in a regressive state.

      • gnutrino@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        In the case of cars there isn’t really an alternative. The study the article cites looked at a bunch of different manufacturers and found the all sucked for privacy.

    • NekuSoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same. I’ve been slowly adding more and more smart devices to my Home Assistant instance and seeing it all interact is super neat. That said, the search for products that work 100% local and don’t depend on the cloud is a total pain, outside of some products using the Zigbee standard and such.

      • GlitzyArmrest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Zigbee and z-wave is the way to go, yeah. They work completely local and disconnected from the internet (in fact, they cannot directly connect to the internet).

  • qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    1 year ago

    I post this a second time because this post is more active. What can we do to stop the transfer of data? Can we disconnect the antenna/modem that connects the cars to the Internet?

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      I know my vehicle has a fuse to pull to disconnect the modem.

          • luciferofastora
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            …until they’re all too old to use safely.

            Have any actually sustainable advice too?

              • CaptainPedantic@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                13
                ·
                1 year ago

                Safe from a privacy perspective. Otherwise they’re very unsafe by modern standards. Minimal airbags. Often no ABS. What ABS that is there is less sophisticated than modern systems. Worse structures for crash protection. No stability control. No traction control.

                Plus they’re just old. Last year, I spent more on my 20 year old car than I did on my 2 year old car, that includes loan payments on the new car, fuel, tires, insurance, and maintenance.

                Get something from this century at least.

              • ekky43@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Go for a car from the 19th century just to be sure. They might miss a few features, such as differential, but if you’re worried about your privacy it’ll be worth it!

                /j obviously.

            • Wookie@artemis.camp
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              I guess you’ll have to do your research on that but you saying there is not one car for you is just wrong

              • monk@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                This article is literally about how they tested 25 brands and zero of them passed privacy review.

        • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can take public transportation. Oh wait, that requires governments to actually supply cities with useful and we’ll organized public transportation and since you’re probably in the US (the only country left that still uses the useless “miles” metric) and the US government has been bought up by (amongst others)car companies, there isn’t any meaningful pyblxi transportation left.

          • demlet@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I can assure you that miles are quite useful for determining distance, I do it nearly every day. Other than that you’re spot on.

            • missveeronica@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Fucking Europeans. They have no problem telling us hos shitty we are. But if we comment once on something that happens in their country, we get the typical “don’t comment on our country, because you don’t live there”.

              • demlet@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                1 year ago

                What I don’t get is the intensity. I can’t tell if it’s sarcasm maybe, or just a cultural difference in how people talk? Like, I can take a good ribbing about using weird units of measurement, but some non-Americans seem genuinely pissed off about it. Seems like a waste of energy for something that almost never affects you if you’re not American. I mean, most of us Americans were born with it, it’s not like we got a say or anything. We kind of have more pressing matters right now, maybe give us a few decades before we worry about our measurement system?

                • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Interestingly enough there have already been attempts to shift to metric since at least the 70’s but it’s mostly been pushed back by conservatives.

                  People are not really pissed about it but more annoyed because there are loads of loudmouth Americans out there screaming how their country is “NUMBER ONE BABY!” and whenever I have to write something with units, I always have to add conversions for Americans because they Wong understand what the entire rest of the world does,which is frankly annoying too.

                  That’s why

              • luciferofastora
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                European here, we’re not all like that. I do think the metric system is better (not least because I’m used to it, probably), but I’m not about to use “hurr durr u so stoopid using imperial” as an argument in a conversation about privacy and the unfeasibility of using public transport in a system where that infrastructure is clearly deficient.

                That guy’s a cunt, but don’t generalise that any more than you’d want me to generalise Bush to be the average US-American.

              • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                That would actually be the entire rest of the world. Also the scientific part of the US, as everyone got the memo on that the metric system is just so much better.

                Sorry for poking at it but it’s tiresome that I continuously need to add conversions to weird units for Americans because if I don’t I get flushed with messages if I can please use “real units” or “freedom units”. Stop using a badly designed 300 year old system and join the rest of the world already. Even your scientists and engineers already do so, its just that the rest of your citizens don’t want to hop on for some reason.

                And hey, you’re free to criticize Europe if you want, there is more than enough legit criticism to be had. It’s just that Europe doesn’t have the level of issues that the US has and at least Europe isn’t screaming around that they’re the best. Europe generally knows that it’s flawed but it’s trying to get better. The US is rolling off a cliff whilst screaming they’re number one. Eh, okay then!

              • demlet@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                How ironic. I guess you haven’t been on Reddit in the past decade.

                • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  13 years Redditor, on average 2 posts and 20 comments per day. I was a power user there until the purge

              • luciferofastora
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Bananas aren’t uniform in length, unlike a fixed standard. Metric is more convenient in scientific or mathematic contexts where conversions are much easier to make with it, but there’s nothing disqualifying Imperial from being uses as a general system for measuring distance.

                And before you dunk on me for being a dumb American, I’m German. I’m just also not a moron nor an asshole with a misplaced superiority complex over something as trivial as units of measurement.

                Unless you wanna talk about MM/dd/yy, stick to the public transport topic. You had a valid point there before you smeared it with stupid shit.

  • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This has been one of the major reasons I have no desire to buy a new car. I do not want a $30k IoT device that spies on me. Unfortunately, that is pretty much the norm now.

    If/when I am forced to buy another, I’ll be looking hard into which ones are the easiest to rip the modem out of. Can’t be an IoT spying device without the internet.

    • Logh@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m looking into restomods myself. No need to buy a new car and rip it up.

      • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        People modify their cars all the time and my insurance company has no business tracking everything I do either.

      • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fuck that insurance company. When mine shipped a couple of OBD-II connection boxes for us to install for our auto insurance, I sent them back. They told me I wouldn’t get their special discount if I didn’t install the trackers in our 2 vehicles. I said I’m not installing your tracker boxes regardless. I continue to have car insurance, and those alleged discounts didn’t really amount to much.

  • cloud@lazysoci.al
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m reposting this in every thread so anyone can see:

    https://www.nissanusa.com/privacy.html

    Sensitive personal information, including driver’s license number, national or state identification number, citizenship status, immigration status, race, national origin, religious or philosophical beliefs, sexual orientation, sexual activity, precise geolocation, health diagnosis data, and genetic information.

      • MataVatnik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Keep sending images of goatse. But seriously speaking, it’s probably not humans that are collating and sifting the data. It’s all being fed to an algorithm.

        • topinambour_rex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Humans have access to the databases. Now another human can go to the nissan’sheadquarters of their countries, and request by the law of this country, that nissan provides the name of every people who had gay sex in their nissans.

          Then they can arrest them and execute them.

          That’s the issue with collected datas. You ignore when some totilarist government will access those.

        • Wahots@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          All the more reason to poison the data. Make them think everyone has a breadfucking kink and that they spend their Friday nights getting anally inserted baby carrots beaten back out of them by pimp bodyguards for $1,000.

    • Nightwind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wtf. Genetic information. So they can take your DNA after bringing your car in for service and sell it?

        • Nightwind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I was not joking at all - this is exactly what their legal stance is. I agree someone at Nissan is very likely thinking about how to make money with this.

  • Scott@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can’t really go into depth, but I worked for a major automaker, privacy is a joke for newer cars even if you don’t pay for the Internet plans.

    • pyr0ball@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is there anything a mildly competent electronics enthusiast could do to disable any outbound data?

      • Scott@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Unfortunately not for the company I worked for, all I will say is it was one of the top 5 automakers in the world.

        I assume the others were also doing similar things in their cars.

      • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I unplugged the cellular modem in mine. But it was made last decade, so they probably make those harder to find now.

            • Scott@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Hard to say if it’s the same for most of the major auto makers, but from what I had been told by the head unit team, mostly everything for connected services was run through the head unit.

  • 30mag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nissan also said it collected information on “sexual activity.” It didn’t explain how.

    Nissan doesn’t provide a detailed explanation of how the data is collected, but they say that the source they collect the data is “Direct contact with users and Nissan employees,” Whatever that means.

    https://www.nissanusa.com/privacy.html

    • Intralexical@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nissan also said it collected information on “sexual activity.” It didn’t explain how.

      Nissan doesn’t provide a detailed explanation of how the data is collected, but they say that the source they collect the data is “Direct contact with users and Nissan employees,” Whatever that means.

      Based on this information, I can only infer that the Nissan sales handbook has a section on using seduction for particularly difficult and/or hot potential customers.

      …I used to work at a pizza shop. Oh, so that’s why we got so many orders from the local Nissan dealership!

  • Dasnap@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    Are dumb cars still manufactured? I don’t drive so I have no clue what the market’s like.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    But drivers are given little or no control over the personal data their vehicles collect, researchers for the nonprofit Mozilla Foundation said Wednesday in their latest “Privacy Not Included” survey Security standards are also vague, a big concern given automakers’ track record of susceptibility to hacking.

    Cars scored worst for privacy among more than a dozen product categories – including fitness trackers, reproductive-health apps, smart speakers and other connected home appliances – that Mozilla has studied since 2017.

    The absence of such a law lets connected devices and smartphones amass data for tailored ad targeting and other marketing – while also raising the odds of massive information theft through cybersecurity breaches.

    Japan-based Nissan astounded researchers with the level of honesty and detailed breakdowns of data collection its privacy notice provides, a stark contrast with Big Tech companies such as Facebook or Google.

    Further, Nissan says it can share “inferences” drawn from the data to create profiles “reflecting the consumer’s preferences, characteristics, psychological trends, predispositions, behaviour, attitudes, intelligence, abilities, and aptitudes.”

    If an owner opts out of data collection, Tesla’s privacy notice says the company may not be able to notify drivers “in real time” of issues that could result in “reduced functionality, serious damage, or inoperability.”


    The original article contains 874 words, the summary contains 206 words. Saved 76%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • MataVatnik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      When Tesla came about ,I said privacy in cars is going to be a problem in the the future if people keep buying them and nobody protests. Well, we are now in that future. Crotch rockets may be our salvation.

      • Wahots@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        So many health insurance companies would be going public with fat IPOs. Nothing like motorcycles to make the line go sky-high, lol.

        My mom worked in the ER back in the day. Any patients dying of organ failure without a donor just had to make it to the weekend to live (seriously, not joking). People would dust off their cycles for the weekend and then donate and save lives.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    But drivers are given little or no control over the personal data their vehicles collect, researchers for the nonprofit Mozilla Foundation said Wednesday in their latest “Privacy Not Included” survey Security standards are also vague, a big concern given automakers’ track record of susceptibility to hacking.

    Cars scored worst for privacy among more than a dozen product categories – including fitness trackers, reproductive-health apps, smart speakers and other connected home appliances – that Mozilla has studied since 2017.

    The absence of such a law lets connected devices and smartphones amass data for tailored ad targeting and other marketing – while also raising the odds of massive information theft through cybersecurity breaches.

    Japan-based Nissan astounded researchers with the level of honesty and detailed breakdowns of data collection its privacy notice provides, a stark contrast with Big Tech companies such as Facebook or Google.

    Further, Nissan says it can share “inferences” drawn from the data to create profiles “reflecting the consumer’s preferences, characteristics, psychological trends, predispositions, behaviour, attitudes, intelligence, abilities, and aptitudes.”

    If an owner opts out of data collection, Tesla’s privacy notice says the company may not be able to notify drivers “in real time” of issues that could result in “reduced functionality, serious damage, or inoperability.”


    The original article contains 874 words, the summary contains 206 words. Saved 76%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!