• Hamartia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    In the UK the BBC only has advertisements for its own content, nothing else. As bad as its got since Tony Blair and David Cameron both undermined its independence and quality, at least there are no ad breaks in its shows.

    • GeneralInterest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      True, they don’t show commercial adverts in the UK, but they do to other countries. People outside the UK can access the BBC website but they’ll see adverts on there, and apparently BBC America (shown in the US) has commercial adverts

      And Channel 4 of course does show commercial adverts in the UK, but I think they still make some decent content, and I don’t think they’re on the verge of self-destruction

      Maybe the real problem is when an entity is chasing profits, because Channel 4 isn’t a normal for-profit business, since they’re owned by the government, and I think they have to abide by some rules

      • Hamartia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Well the distinction here is that TV license paying citizens of the UK don’t get the ads.

        • GeneralInterest@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          But then you could look at Channel 4, which does show ads to UK people, but I think Channel 4 is still okay and I don’t think it has been ruined by ads. So maybe a profit motive is what causes enshittification, rather than just ads. I definitely hate ads but maybe ads alone don’t destroy platforms.

          • Hamartia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            You won’t get any disagreement from me on the corrosive effects of advertising.

            I do think that Channel 4 used to regularly produce greater content than it can now. But that probably is more to do with advertising revenue being leeched away to online platforms and the growth of its direct competitors.

            • GeneralInterest@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Interesting, maybe the content has changed, I probably don’t watch enough TV to have noticed. But I think Channel 4 news is pretty good, and I liked their Paralympics coverage.

              • Hamartia@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                They’ve still got a good reputation for news. So good that after a few combative interviews with Tory MPs (back when they were in power a few years ago) the Culture Secretary wanted to sell the channel off.

                Don’t get me wrong they can still produce the occasional good comedy or documentary but they used to do so consistently.

                • GeneralInterest@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  True, I remember the government trying to sell off Channel 4. Anyway I guess my point was that ads don’t necessarily ruin a platform if the platform has a decent purpose other than just profit… although I definitely do hate seeing any ads, even on Channel 4 or anything else.