The protection of undersea internet cables is a matter of national security.

  • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    10 hours ago

    US like always is missing the point. The real story should be that redundancy is key. Even with those cables cut, there was no noticeable interruption in internet services.

    • Rooskie91
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Yeah but have you considered that redundancy costs money that could be going to shareholders?

      • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Never crossed my mind. Time to start a new business venture, thanks for the idea.

    • thefartographer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Did you even read the headline? Redundancy isn’t the issue, the Chinese is. If we can just make one super-American aluminum cable, it’ll last forever!

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    They could also lay down more cables for redundancy. Expensive but it would prove much more safe. It would be best if they were owned by two separate companies using totally different stuff.

    The good new right now is that China would lose more than the US would if a cable got cut.