So with the recent drama it looks like bcachefs isn’t going to stay in the kernel for too long. What do I do now? I have my root filesystem as bcachefs on multiple devices. Is it possible to migrate to btrfs or ext4?

  • Laser@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    While I understand the sentiment, I’d argue that an apology should be made in the same context as what you’re apologizing for. Kent made his statements on the LKML - if his apology is sincere, I don’t think it’s too much to ask to put it there as well

    • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I’m not a fan of forced apology. It’s just there like forcing a billionaire to apology, so some people feel better and to get a false sense. An apology should come from them without asking for one. Otherwise it loses its meaning and is only a formal apology, not a meaningful one. It can even make it worse, because people tend to forget look over the issue as resolved. As said, I do not like the idea at all.

      • Laser@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Nobody forced him to apologize. On the other hand, the Linux community isn’t forced to take his patches.

      • beleza pura@lemmy.eco.br
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        it doesn’t matter if his apology is sincere or not, bc the point is not to make him sincerely repent from his sins. the point is ensuring he will subject himself to the kernel guidelines whether he likes it or not. a public apology means “regardless of how right i think i am, i will now follow the rules of the house”

        simple as