• shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Y’all missing the whole point here.

    If an area requires covering, it might as well produce some power. And cells on the ground aren’t as bad as they’re made out.

    I have one laying flat in the yard powering a 12V water pump. Been there for 6-months, covered in pollen and dust, weeds growing over one side, grass cuttings on top, never cleaned, works fine. I have another on my shed roof at our camp. Same deal with the pollen and dust, works fine. But guess which one is easier to clean?

    Cells don’t have to be pristine to produce power. And if you do want to clean them? The installation pictured looks easy to work with a garden hose and squeegee, couldn’t take 30 minutes. Use concrete instead? OK, now you have to power wash it. What a pain.

    • Troy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      This depends on what you’re optimizing for. If you are optimizing for total energy captured per square metre, then you’re right about the benches.

      But suppose you have a sufficient flux even with some areas being covered so you aren’t bothered by the shadows. Wouldn’t it be aesthetically superior to have uniform tile types? Or would you prefer they micromanage the tile placement such that the tiles below the bench shadows are different?

      Anyway, I think it is a good idea. Better than the silly solar roadways crap.

    • kameecoding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Literally just put them 2 and a half meters higher so they provide shade for sitting in the bench instead of people shading the panels.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Oohh, solar roadways, part 4621559

    Trailer: they suck, don’t work, and are made by people who have no idea what the fuck they’re doing

  • stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    For fuck sake!

    Put solar on roofs, not where people walk/drive!

    Can we please stop wasting resources on this shit?

  • OmegaLemmy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Can’t they just make it a roof?

  • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    We need more trees and green areas in cities to shade and cool them down, not more heat soaking open areas that heat them up!

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      PV Magazine is more or less an outlet for press releases by companies trying to innovate (often in air quotes) with photovoltaics. I’m honestly not even sure why it’s allowed here; it’s completely uncritical. May as well cite a press release on the manufacturer’s website at that point instead of laundering it through a magazine.

  • BETYU@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    never use solar panels for side walks its a stupid idea. and there is a reason why solar panels are placed at angle and not flat on the ground.