• queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    24 days ago

    This implies the inaccessibility is a side effect. Is it? Or is punishing the pregnant, disabled, and elderly just an added bonus?

  • FALGSConaut [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    24 days ago

    They’re doing this shit where I live too, except it’s making sure you’re exposed to the elements as much as possible as a way of “discouraging” people from using transit stops for shelter. They didn’t want people using them as shelters from our brutal winters so they made sure no one can stay warm while they wait, problem solved!

  • axont [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    24 days ago

    Ok so the estimate for number of people sleeping on the streets or subways every night is around 4,140 from a federally mandated survey from July of this year

    damn if only the wealthiest city on earth had the money to house an additional 4,140 people but alas it’s impossible. That’s almost like two blocks of housing, can you imagine it

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      I don’t know about New York, but Chicago has over 300,000 vacant homes.

      Gosh, where would we find room for 4,140 people? It’s impossible. 🫠