It was a got damn stunt, offc

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    17 minutes ago

    The AP is supposed to be a neutral source, but they are decidedly right leaning.

    There is clear, relevant reporting to be done on how odd the structure of all this is and that the app’s self imposed shutdown message specifically praised trump, by name. They buried a photo of it, but I don’t see direct text in the article discussing that. They also don’t mention the fact that the CEO had been privately meeting with trump recently.

    They say Biden had a part in the ban, though he said publicly he would not enforce it - what matters there, that AP doesn’t mention, is that the republicans hello humanitarian aide to Ukraine hostage back in April, saying they’d block unless the rock you ban was passed. Laying the groundwork for this hollow attempt to “blame Biden” and position trunk as a solution (to a problem he instigated and that republican think tanks engineered).

    They do say the CEO will attend and have a “prime seating location” but not clarifying that the seats he’ll be in are typically reserved for living past US presidents.

    Fucking joke

  • Max-P@lemmy.max-p.me
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I bet the new algorithm will be pushing push far right content to everyone just like Twitter and Meta, this was a stunt to silence the leftists.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    34 minutes ago

    Spreading for awareness, I’ve been posting this in relevant threads for a week - This is all theater.

    trump was always going to “save” tik tok after starting the initial push to ban it (for the wrong reasons) to pretend he did something for you. Worst part is that all of the no/low info voters and non voters will eat it up.

    It’s the equivalent of a person pushing you into the middle of the street and at the very last second, that same person tells the drivers to all stop. “Wow, I owe you my life!”

    And now, this adds two layers:

    1. You think trump and the Supreme Court are colluding? now they get to say, nah uh!!! Even though again, this is all convoluted.

    2. trump gets to look “stronger” than the “highest court in the land” to help delude the next generation of low info tiktok folks.

    P.s. The Chinese “protest” apps that were downloaded are going to mine the FUCK out of these millions of phones in the brief window they have them. Also, when the kids inevitably move back to tiktok, majority of them will still leave these other apps installed on their phones, dormant and collecting indefinitely in the background.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    18 minutes ago

    GOOD! I’m looking Forward to Trump RESTORING this App that he said was CHYNESE SPYWARE being used to Hurt Americans!

  • Mrkawfee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Gaza ceasefire and reversed TikTok ban. He’s basically won over younger voters before he’s even started.

  • Kekzkrieger@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Call me crazy but this feels all like a plan to push the Maga movement, first the “bad democrats” take away the “lovely” tiktok, then “good” trump brings back the beloved “noncensorship” tiktok because he “loves” freedom of speech or smth.

  • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Note that the law does not prohibit TikTok from operating. It prohibits companies like Google and Apple from distributing it, and according to this article, they are in fact not distributing it.

    Even as TikTok was flickering back on, it remained unavailable for download in Apple and Google’s app stores.

    TikTok shut off voluntarily and that appears to have been an excellent PR move, but we won’t know for certain until Trump does or doesn’t do something about it in the next few days.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      52 minutes ago

      Sec. 2) This division prohibits distributing, maintaining, updating, or providing internet hosting services for a foreign adversary controlled application (e.g., TikTok).

      The “providing internet hosting services” seems like it could be an issue there

    • ryper@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 hours ago

      TikTok may trust Trump but Apple and Google are much better off acting like the law is in force and could be used against them.

      • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        TikTok also was and still is acting like the law is in force - the law does not require it to shut off. They aren’t taking any legal risk.

  • Tony Bark@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Trump isn’t even become president yet, and already they’re giving him praises.

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Republicans are always president and can do things like negotiate the release of hostages. They just let democrats pretend sometimes.

  • BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 hours ago

    This story has lots more to run. Trump is giving them a 90 day reprieve but hes going to try and extract something from them.

    I suspect he will still try and get them to sell to one of his cronies. And bytedance won’t do that.

  • priapus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The decomcrats are fucking morons for allowing Trump to take credit for this. This was the obvious outcome and was easily preventable.

    • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Well, it’s a federal law, so yeah, basically. I mean, it’s kind of up to the president if the DOJ actually prosecutes people for breaking federal law. Take Biden for example. He just pardoned a bunch of people who were in prison for federal drug charges. The laws they broke are still on the books, and what they did was still technically illegal, even if it’s stupid to begin with.

      Somebody at the DOJ could just go rogue and try to enforce the laws, but they would just be fired if the president didn’t like it.

      • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        58 minutes ago

        He just pardoned a bunch of people who were in prison for federal drug charges

        These weren’t even the worst pardons…

        He let out some cunt who robbed her town blind.

        Imagine being corrupt and then being pardoned by the president. That’s a slap to the taxpayer