• Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    If we (people in general) do it, we’re being filthy thieves and the reason why everything is bad. But when it’s a megacorpo, it’s suddenly a-OK?

    Screw this shit. Information should be like the air, free for everyone. Not free for the GAFAM chaste and paid for us untouchables.

  • tenchiken@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Meta also allegedly modified settings “so that the smallest amount of seeding possible could occur,” a Meta executive in charge of project management, Michael Clark, said in a deposition.

    Douchebags.

  • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Meta also allegedly modified settings “so that the smallest amount of seeding possible could occur,”

    Big tech taking without giving back to the community once again.

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I think this is still going to be a net benefit to us, though. Meta may not have contributed much bandwidth, which is leeching in the short term, but in the long term they’re now forced to contribute something much more important; lawyer power. Meta is going to have to fight to defend piracy.

        • FaceDeer@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 minutes ago

          You think Meta will just roll over and hand out whatever penalties the publishers demand of them?

          Meta isn’t going to be defending us. It’s going to be defending itself. Because it is now one of us.

          • brisk@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 minutes ago

            Secret out-of-court settlement is an option.

            Also known as “bribing your way out of the law”

  • verdigris@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Motherfuckers are actually arguing that seeding a torrent isn’t “distributing” unless they can show an instance of someone downloading a book from their IP… If that flies they better overturn every fucking piracy conviction ever.

  • kwomp2@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Isnt thatvway to much volume for text? I would imagine every book ever written to be judt a few tb. But I also don’t know much about the issue

    • Obelix@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 minutes ago

      They downloaded the torrents from Annas Archive, which are standing at ~500TB currently. Keep in mind that you’re dealing not only with text, but also with books scanned as images, books with lots of illustrations, scientific articles with illustrations and also comic books.