Why does it feel that the evil sides globally are winning. Even evil people are winning. Why?

  • Christer Enfors@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 minutes ago

    What you’re saying is true, but we must also remember that construction is always slower than destruction. What this means is that slow, steady improvements are not newsworthy - and thus gets no airtime - compared to destruction which happens over night and is thus newsworthy.

    So there is also a lot of slow, steady improvements going on in the world that we never hear about. There’s not enough of it, I don’t think, to offset the big evils of greed, climate change, and fake news. But it is there, and we must not forget it.

  • demizerone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Capitalism is dying because of unchecked greed and people are turning to socialism. The wealthy choose fascism. Until we have class unity. Once we bring out the guillotines, They will retreat to spending the rest of their lives in the bunkers they have built with their stolen wealth.

    • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      “Once we bring out the guillotines”
      Depends where you live.
      I hear the hardcore revolutionary libs in the US have found a much more powerful way to defeat fascism… buy nothing for 1 day.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        The US has a really serious problem on their hands which is that their trade war won’t achieve anything. The US doesn’t make anything, it famously doesn’t make anything, the only reason that they trade with Canada is because Canada is close. Even then it’s mostly just food stuffs which Canada can make themselves.

        But they have virtually nothing to offer internationally hence the trade deficit, that trump is so upset about, in the first place

    • Ithorian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      And who you going to put on the guillotines? You own! People are getting so blind with anger

  • Doorbook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Because now it is affecting you personally. Before it was in the middle east or some random aftican nation where people dont speak english, and media make sure it is not in the front page. Reading some history of any conflict will show the root starting a while back but no one cares.

  • SabinStargem@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I think the issue in America, is that the Constitution only addressed political power, but failed to account for fiscal strength. Money is inherently a thing that manipulates the fates of individuals, companies, and nations alike. By not setting down rules, limitations, and expectations regarding economics, the Founding Fathers allowed a key form of power go unaddressed.

    The vast majority of Project 2025’s major backers are wealthy people, who have far beyond what any normal person can ever hope to possess. This imbalance means that workers have to sacrifice much time, money, and energy to be barely heard on a single issue, while a rich person can just hire experts to massage every aspect of their many messages and to deliver it everywhere with a mighty voice.

    IMO, we will need a Constitution v2.0 that fixes not only assorted political flaws like the voting system, but also prevents wealth from being a microphone that only a few can afford.

    • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The constitution isn’t some Holy Document that has the power to shape reality. You can write in as many legal clauses as you like, but so long as you’re allowing a small class of oligarchs to control capital, they will use that power to influence policy.

  • rational_lib@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    The internet. It led to the following:

    • Good social change occurred very rapidly from the 1990s-2010s, causing highly motivated pushback from those who didn’t like the changes
    • Rising wealth inequality caused by tech billionaires increased incentives and capability for a small number of extremely wealthy people to seize control of media and political power centers
    • Foreign dictator governments became more able to more easily spread pro-dictator propaganda
    • Media became more decentralized, leading to some good things but also the hijacking of our psychology to spread fear and disgust for the sake of grabbing attention
    • JOMusic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      I would just like to push back and say that the Internet was an open public project, and it has helped countless people across the world. Every single problematic tech that people are pointing to at the moment are closed-source commercial projects.

      That is Capitalism at work.

        • Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          44 minutes ago

          It is a fact that china and russia are mingeling in foreign afairs and give money supporting political parties in countrys with their interest. The AfD and BSW in germany are great examples. Actively getting paid by and spy for russia and china. Krah (AfD) employed actively chinese spys in his political office.

    • witten@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yeah, they wanted change. But then the fascists conveniently swooped in and pretended they offered the type of change people actually wanted. (Cheap eggs, etc.)

  • BaldManGoomba@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Because they have always been win. Evil never sleeps and it will always exist. Good people have to fight every day to make progress. Perfect example is Bernie sanders and democrats. Bernie has been fighting since the 70s. Democrats have been it is good enough things are fine just defend the status quo. Meanwhile people are working everyday to setup bad things with currently things reaching back as far as Clinton and people can argue Reagan.

    Evil never sleeps and is constantly working to undermine peace. Lots of people are honestly mediocre or middle of the road once things are good enough they stop fighting. There has only ever been a few good people fighting. People deep in community actively doing good things.

  • WhatSay@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Change requires a massive push, and apparently people need to suffer much much more, to inspire that momentum.

  • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Well, I’d say it’s because they don’t even hide it anymore. They know they can do whatever they want, and get away with it.

    Enshitification is a real thing, and companies and evil people are being blatant about it, because they know they don’t have to hide it because they know they can’t be stopped.

    It sucks. I hate it. I wish we could do something about it.

  • redwattlebird@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Wealth inequality caused by all the things mentioned here and more. It allows the wealthy to control narrative that is fed to the masses, control the amount of free time people have to think and control how much pressure is placed on your lives.

    The free thinking world is gone.

    But the ‘3 meals away from a revolution’ is always true and the rich will always get more greedy. When everyone no longer has the ability to free themselves, that’s when a lot of heads will roll.

  • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Because class war is being raged but most of the global north working class don’t have any class consciousness. Capitalism is working on doing what it has done to the global South for decades but this time to the global North. Fascism is Imperialism turned inward. Welcome to the rest of our lives.

    • phlegmy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      What has capitalism done to the global south?
      Is that just a metaphor, or are you literally talking about Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, South America and Antarctica?

      Sorry, I’m just a little confused about what you mean.

      • 10001110101@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Global South basically just means underdeveloped/developing nations.

        Capitalism results in the rich, mostly in developed countries, extracting resources for low prices and exploiting desperate workers for low wages in developing countries. The developing countries get little in return. Some of these countries have been able to muster some protectionism to mitigate so much transfer of wealth out if their country (such as China). Developed nations have purposely kept some developing nations destabilised to maximize exploitation.

        • phlegmy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Ah, gotcha.
          Just researched a bit and noticed it’s an official term used by the UN.

          It just sounds a little weird, as somebody from a southern nation that this doesn’t seem to apply to.

          China is also in the northern hemisphere, so it also seems strange that it’s called ‘global south’.

          Something like ‘low economic’ would have made a lot more sense to me, but I guess ‘global south’ is the official term.