• MeepMorp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    "To start, we’re offering each Premium individual, as well as plan managers for Family and Duo accounts, 15 hours of listening per month—giving them the ability to enjoy as many titles as they want within that monthly allocation.

    […]

    For those super audiophiles who use up their 15 hours before their monthly billing cycles refresh, you can purchase a 10-hour top-up to finish that series. Not sure how many hours you have left? Check it at any time in your in-app settings. "

    No cost listed on how much the top-ups are.

    • Ech@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thought this was an interesting addition, but I see they figured out a way to ruin it from the start.

    • db2@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don't know if they have these, but for the purpose of clarity it doesn't matter.

      The Martian is 11 hours.
      The Color of Magic is 7 hours.

      That's two audio books that together surpassed their joke of a monthly allotment. Two.

    • cheery_coffee@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Drake meme:

      ✋Release subscription service and destroy Audible

      👉 Copy Audible and nickel and dime the users to maximize revenue per user

  • theskyisfalling@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    I'd really love an audio book service like Netflix but 15 hours is a joke, that is 2 days worth of listening for me personally and a lot of books you wouldn't be able to finish in that time.

    I've tried the majority of the audio books services out there and they are all a load of shit, I think I'll stick to piracy at this point, at least then I can keep the books I enjoy too to come back to again.

      • theskyisfalling@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah I checked it out, it is basically audibles business model with the whole 1 credit a month thing. Yes, DRM free is great but I average 7-8 hours of listening a day so one book doesn't last very long at all.

    • KingJalopy @lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Use Libby, with your library card. Unlimited audiobooks and works for almost any library.

      • theskyisfalling@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        No, no it doesn't. For a start I am not in the US so it isn't Libby and secondly I tried the library card / app route and the selection is woefully shite.

        It doesn't even have what would be the most popular books for example say Lord of the Rings. It has a seemingly random selection. On top of that they have minimal licenses for the books so if you do manage to find something interesting you want to listen to someone may have already "rented it out" via the app and so you'd have to wait for them to "return" it before you can listen.

        Library cards and apps (at least where I am) are one of the poorest choices available and that is saying something going up against the utter dogshit that is audible.

    • David From Space@orbiting.observer
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sorry, best we can do is make a new tier at the same price that only plays music, while we jack up the price of the new Premium Plan to account for 'rising market costs'!

      • TheFriendlyDickhead@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        To be fair spotify bleads money, because the big music labels are sucking most of the money out of spotify.

        Podcasts and stuff are their way of trying to get out of that uncomfortable situation, because they own the rights of the stuff produced via their platform.

    • cheeseburger@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Perhaps as likely as YouTube Premium separating music access from no ads on videos… I wish. It keeps me locked in.

      • TrustingZebra@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        They had that YouTube Premium Lite tier in a few regions, which was basically that. But Google just killed it.

    • PrivateNoob@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It's understandable why they are doing this. Apparently the company has never ever made any profits, and since the main 3 record labels are demanding 70% of the revenue from Spotify, they can't do anything to change that revenue split to 50-50 instead as an example.

      • ijeff@lemdro.id
        shield
        M
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The GitHub seems to only be for a downloader app that distributes unverified APKs that don't currently do anything. Removing this thread as a precaution - particularly given recent news of malicious modded APKs.

  • ijeff@lemdro.idM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Thanks for sharing! I do think audiobooks are a much better fit than trying to make podcasts exclusive and paywalled.

  • Pasta Dental@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    People on here are acting like Spotify raises their price every two weeks like Netflix or something. This is an added feature that will likely not raise the costs to the user as it is intended to reduce the part of revenue they give to music labels (i.e. this helps keep the price you pay the same because they can't make a profit, so the alternative is higher prices)

  • Mac@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Great. More garbage I don't want shoved in my face.

    I'm getting real tired of modern day UX in apps.

    • Critical_Insight@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Spotify is and will always remain a music streaming app for me. I spend way more time listening to podcasts instead of music, but I don't do that in Spotify.

  • camr_on@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    15 hours is pathetic lol. Need to hurry up and move my music library off of Spotify

    • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      "As many titles as they want"

      Sooo… around one and a half standard length audio books a month, from a category probably filled with garbage romance novels and cheap sci fi. Be still my beating heart…

      • camr_on@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It's now one of my more expensive monthly subscriptions since I have the family plan, and they don't offer a way to pay for a year to save overall last time I checked. I'm just not as impressed as I used to be considering the price rose as well

  • Caketaco@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been running modified Spotify IPAs and desktop scripts for years to get around paying premium; here’s to hoping that I can still play these audiobooks!

  • KᑌᔕᕼIᗩ@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have the family account but I'm not the one who will use this. Hopefully it's not a pain to switch who can claim this because currently it's limited to the main account holder.

  • philodendron@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Podcasts in the app are terrible but this is something if actually consider switching to Spotify for

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It's moreso how they make audiobooks and podcasts a little subheading on the library page instead of being able to just switch over to full podcast and audiobook browsing.

      I absolutely love that they're skip song button is a 30 second jump on podcasts, makes the car journey so easy.

      I used to use Youtube for podcasts but it isn't good at skimming through bits without opening your phone and doesn't integrate with Android auto at all.

    • Otter@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yea I think people are just exhausted with what companies are doing and are distrustful of any changes. A lot of tech company changes recently have been somewhere between pointless to very anti-user.

      This seems ok, and spotify is one of the services that I continue to pay for and use. It does what I want, and the price has been fairly similar for years. Any new features would be nice.

      edit:

      To start, we’re offering each Premium individual, as well as plan managers for Family and Duo accounts, 15 hours of listening per month—giving them the ability to enjoy as many titles as they want within that monthly allocation.

      Well that's not amazing. I guess if you find something you like, you can use another service afterwards. What would be bad is if they made some audiobooks exclusive, like they did with podcasts before (partially?) reversing it