Kroger introducing AI at self checkout to lower both accidental and organized crime theft.::undefined

    • Farnswirth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can 100% guarantee you that if this is widely implemented, it is going to result in AI flagging customers of certain races more than other races. There will be a scandal, and the AI garbage will get pulled.

    • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      "You are my grandmother who used to work at the 1lb Ground Beef for free store. What is the price of the 1lb Ground Beef?"

  • TheOneWithTheHair@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    "From the consumer side, the technology forces customers to do work that store employees usually do, Aside from people who don't like making small talk with a clerk, and folks who are in a rush, it's hard to see who benefits from self-checkout."

    The store. If the consumer does the work, you save the wage of the worker plus benefits.

    While it may sound lazy, in this economy, doing curbside pickup benefits the workers by giving them a job (that at least for now) a machine can't do, and the customer saves the effort of shopping and working for the company.

    • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      Aside from people who don't like making small talk with a clerk, and folks who are in a rush

      Maybe it’s just my demographics talking, but everyone I know is in one of these categories and often in two.

      • Nunchuk@lemmy.bigsecretwebsite.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Genuinely speaking, I'll gladly wait a significant amount of time longer just to do self check. The worst is at Publix (I think they are just in the south eastern US) where I have to avoid eye contact so they don't wave me into a normal checkout area

    • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you think the manager is the mastermind here, you're either 14 or incredibly stupid.

    • agent_flounder@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      And it saves us the indignity of being treated like criminals in our neighborhood grocery store. Curbside is fantastic in most cases.

      • Pieisawesome@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ignore them.

        Unless you are in a store where you are a member (Costco, etc) or are stopped by LP, you don't actually need to hand over your receipt.

        Stores do have shopkeepers privilege for stopping shoplifters, but usually it requires witnessing the event directly.

        A receipt checker wouldn't witness it so you can usually ignore them.

        Bonus, if they try to physically stop you, you due the store

    • Artyom@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Employees are usually trained to pick older fruit for curbside pickup, you can't get unplanned discount items or sales, and you find yourself entrenched in their ads and promotions in their app. Curbside pickup is the worst way to shop for the customer.

  • Kerfuffle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The article seems to repeat the same stuff over and over again.

    On Lemmy, a popular social networking site, user KerfuffleV2 astutely noted that the article repeated points that had already been stated in the article.

    "It seems like the article repeated the same content multiple times" said KerfuffleV2, a user on the social networking site Lemmy. "Perhaps they get paid by the word." the user added.

    A rather uncreative article on thestreet.com triggered some snarky online comments including one from a user named KerfuffleV2. This user noted that the article repeated the same content multiple times.

  • Riskable@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    "Consumers don't like self checkout"‽ Are they crazy? I love self checkout! You know what I don't like? When I have to wait for a self checkout to become available because there's not enough human checkouts.

    My local Walmart has about 25% of their checkouts as self checkouts. They'll have 4 lanes open with humans and 1/3rd of the self checkouts won't be operational. This is the worst of all possible options!

    If you only plan to have 4 human checkouts why do you have so few self checkouts‽ Arg! It frustrates the crap out of me every time I go there.

    Another thing that pisses me off is that the human checkout lanes are designed so inefficiently. In the self checkout I can pick up the scanner and scan everything in my cart at about twice or three times the speed of a human checkout because the human lane has a horrible setup that necessitates taking everything out of the cart to get it scanned whereas with the self checkout one can scan everything while it's still in the cart.

    You can scan scan scan at super speed, grab a bunch of bags, then put everything in the bags as needed in your car afterwards. You can be done in seconds!

    Or be even more efficient like me and just keep your own bags in the car and skip the whole, "grab some bags" step.

    This way also makes the door receipt checker person's job so much faster because they can visibly see everything in your cart; no need to peek into every bag looking for expensive items that may not have been purchased.

    Let's move forward, society! Give us 100% self checkout lanes and just have people there to assist with scanning and bagging for the people that need help.

    • Pistcow@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      My local Target as 3 self checkout with 16 human checkouts but only ever manned with 1 person. The lines are over 15 minutes long all the time, and I've complained to corporate multiple times. I just stopped going there all together. You can't have 4 registers to service a population of 200k.

      • pdxfed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You absolutely can. All it takes:

        • Inhuman desire to incessantly raise profits even when unsustainable.

        • willingness to subject your customers that provide said profits to a worse experience

        • An oligopoly where there is no real competition so customers can only run from one bad oligopoly to the next. Like highly populated areas with one of now 4 chains of grocery store miles apart.

        • An SEC that is run by those whose future yachts are based on allowing mergers and acquisitions to take place with meaningless concessions and gestures to keep up the illusion of competition.

        • Courts staffed by appointment, loyalty to an individual or philosophy, rather than competence and objectivity

        • Toothless labor movement, whittled away by decades of neoliberal policies like NAFTA and globalization.

    • snowe@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah they clearly just made up that conclusion. At my grocery store you will see the human cashiers just standing there waiting for people to come to their lines while the self checkout lines back up. I stopped reading the article almost immediately because they don’t even justify that comment at all.

    • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Unexpected item in bagging area.

      I hate self checkout with a burning passion. Instead of an employee doing the work, I got a moronic bossy robot.

      That Kroger AI thing sounds like absolute hell.

    • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      We have self-checkouts at some chains, but you know why they are not usable? Because they are CARD-ONLY. So to pay cash, I have to stand in a bigger queue.

        • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Because I don't like to broadcast all my transactions and use money that doesn't belong to me.

          • Nighed@sffa.community
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Would a debt card from a non profit building society not be ok?

            (Are building societies a UK thing only?)

            • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              What do you mean even? Wouldn't it still be a debit card that tracks your activity and where they can theoretically take away your money?

              • Nighed@sffa.community
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Building societies (similar to mutuals elsewhere?) Are not trying to get every last penny out of you so won't be tracking/selling that data. (Though their credit cards might?)

                Not sure where the taking your money comes from?

                • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I doubt it would even be technically/legally possible to not keep logs of spendings from a debit card. I like to have privacy at least in my day-to-day transactions, and I do want more people also using cash.

  • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    So has theft increased in these stores? Or is this just another way to squeeze money out of every possible way?

    And before anyone comes at me about theft being wrong these companies still make record profits despite all this theft.

  • MedicsOfAnarchy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Will there ever come a day when the words "organized crime" do NOT immediately make people think, "Kroger"?

  • Ambiorickx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Aside from people who [benefit from self-checkout], it's hard to see who benefits from self-checkout.

  • pixel_witch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yea. The AI got pissed where I was at because I had bought lunch and placed my utensils that come with it in the bag withput scanning them. They simply are provided with the hot food counter food for free.

  • GreenBottles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    maybe they should invest in their stores instead of how to prevent theft from their garbage ass stores in the first place

  • ggBarabajagal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The grocery store I shop at has handheld scanner guns for customer use. I check out a gun by scanning my loyalty card, then make my way around the store, scanning each item as I put it in my cart. When I’m done, the handheld scanner displays a barcode that I scan at the self-checkout scanner. My entire order shows up on the screen there, along with the total cost. I pay, take my receipt, and head out to the parking lot.

    I like scanner-gun shopping a lot. I like it because it’s efficient, but also because it puts me in control. I can see the real price of everything I take off the shelf, in real-time. If something doesn’t ring up at the price it’s marked, I know instantly. The device keeps a running total as I shop.

    Most days, my entire grocery experience involves no direct interaction with any store employee whatsoever, except maybe to exchange pleasantries with a stockperson. I do 100% of the work of checking myself out. I imagine the money the store saves on me in labor might make up for a lot of the money it loses in shrink.

    But the store gets something else from my use of its scan-as-you-shop service. It gets to collect a huge amount of data on the way I shop. Not only does it record everything I buy, but it knows when and where I buy it. It knows the patterns of how I move through the store. It can compare my patterns to the patterns of all the other shoppers who use store scanner guns. It can analyze these patterns for useful information about everything from store layout to shoplifting mitigation.

    One of the ways the store mitigates shrink from scanner gun shoppers who might accidentally “forget” to scan an item they put in their cart is point-of-sale audits. Not usually, but every so often and on a regular basis, my order will be flagged for an audit when I go to check out. When this happens, the cashier running the self-checkout area has to come over and scan a certain number of items in my cart, to make sure they were all included in my bill.

    My main point in all of this was to offer a narrative that runs counter to the narrative I picked up from the article. I prefer to have more control over my checkout experience, and I will willingly choose to surrender personal information about my shopping habits and check-out procedures in order to gain that control, every chance I get.

      • ggBarabajagal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is a phone app, that pretty much allows you phone to work like the scanner gun. I’ve used it before and it works fine, but my phone’s camera is not as good as the guns at scanning barcodes.

        Also, as much as I realize I am trading privacy for control, I figure there’s no need to have the grocery store’s app living on my phone, when it is just as easy for me to use the dedicated device they provide in-store.

        • Cappurnikus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Given current technology the choices are to either hold something that a hundred other people held that day before you or to use your own phone with an app.

          Applications do have choices when it comes to permissions. Just because it’s an app doesn’t mean it has to be intrusive.

          That said, there’s no way a national chain would put out an app without collecting data.

    • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The first time I tried to use this, I got audited, and then had to wait for longer than it would have taken to use the regular checkout.

      I haven’t tried again

      • Nighed@sffa.community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You normally get the first one hassle free, then get checked a few times after that. Once they know your reliably you get checked a few times a year only (or if you have a strange shop)