• jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Many people are just scared all the time. No one’s smart when they’re scared. The body doesn’t let you. They think the police will protect them.

    Right wing media is largely to blame. And segregation and under funded education, public spaces. And suburbs + car culture isolating everyone.

    Pretty much every right wing idea is bad.

  • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I don’t get why people are fine with arming the police with military hardware like MRAPs.

    Their whole job is to control the civilian population and people want to arm them with the means to drive into a house and start unloading on the residents within?

    They’re a right-wing paramilitary force; we should be limiting their reach instead of giving them armor and quad-damage power-ups.

    • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The police force was supposed to be a strictly civilian force and they should never have access to things beyone what ordinary civilians can get. We’ve come so far away from that that the framers of the consitution would likely regard the modern police force as an invading army.

    • real_squids@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      They kinda make sense in america, it’s a readily available off-road capable transport that can survive pretty much anything civilians throw at it (including the A in MRAP), and there’s already a production line going. A civilian armored car would do the job too but I suspect there’s lobbying/insider trading involved. That and their cops are paranoid as fuck and would rather overspend than risk getting a scratch.

      People are fine with it for the same reason they ignore privacy violations. “I’ve got nothing to hide” = “I won’t break any laws”, therefore it’s never their problem.

      • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        A civilian armored car would do the job too but I suspect there’s lobbying/insider trading involved.

        Police departments used to do that but someone noticed that while Police Departments were spending money on armored vehicles the military was throwing them away. It was a waste of money all around and so the LESO / 1033 Program was born out of the National Defense Authorization Act of 90/91 and then expanded and made permanent in 1997. (Remember that year, it’s important).

        The program actually makes good fiscal sense. Why waste equipment when one branch of Government no longer needs something while another one does.

        A big impetus for police departments participating in the program that many people online today weren’t alive for was the North Hollywood Shootout in 1997. A couple of Bank Robbers carrying full auto weapons and wearing body armor tore the shit out of the Hollywood PD because the Police Department didn’t have the equipment or guns to deal with the problem.

        In the end they had to use hunting rifles taken from a nearby civilian gunstore and a commandeered armored car. Every Cop in the country was scared shitless that it would happen to them because almost no departments were equipped for that level of violence. So they started grabbing surplus IFVs (MRAPs now) and other gear from the 1033 program.

        As time went on and the “Warrior Cop” mentality took hold, primarily from Police Departments hiring untold numbers of returning Gulf War & GWOT Veterans, those Vets pushed to expand their departments use of the 1033 program so they could have access to most of the same gear they were already used to using.

        That’s how we got to where we are in 2025. Each individual step makes sense but the outcome of those cumulative decisions is increasingly problematic.

  • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 hours ago

    If America’s cities were all occupational juntas, practically speaking what would be different? Extrajudicial killings? Public officials and journalists being threatened? Dissent brutally quelled? Top-down class war?

  • Corn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 hours ago

    *training to more effectively violate people’s rights, brutalized, them off camera, and reframe killings to generate less bad PR.

    • burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Lol, you could only wish. The money gets spent on two-five consultants who come up with a powerpoint that could have been made by preteens given an assignment of ‘name ways to deescalate a conflict.’ I remember when there was a training about cops and dogs, because someone ‘important’ finally had their dog shot by a cop. The training was almost literally what you would come up with if you did a quick search on dog behaviors and copy/pasted the worst seo slop article into a powerpoint format.

    • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Those aren’t tanks and Police Departments get them for little or no money as the US Military declares them surplus. It’s a federal program called LESO / 1033 and it’s been around since the '90s.

    • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Yeah, these armored vehicles are being given away for almost free. No appreciable amount of training money is going toward armored vehicle purchases. There are certainly things to criticize here, but the meme is attacking a false reality. (Furthermore, the armored vehicle pictured is mislabeled as a tank for some reason)

    • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      money specifically to exchange for a tank, and the money could not otherwise have been spent.

      So don’t buy a fucking tank and don’t spend the money…jeez that should be a fucking no-brainer.

      • IndescribablySad@threads.net@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Then da boyz revolt because they wanted to ride in something rugged with wheels and then someone runs against you or petitions the local mayor, usurps you, uses the money, and you end up with tanks and less power to monitor their use. You can’t offhandedly dismiss two of the keys to power