narwhal@lemmy.ml to Firefox@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoMozilla opposes Web Integrity API proposalgithub.comexternal-linkmessage-square214fedilinkarrow-up11.78Karrow-down115cross-posted to: degoogle@lemmy.mlbrainworms@lemm.eewebdev@programming.devprivacy@lemmy.mlfirefox@lemmy.mlfirefox@fedia.iotechnology@beehaw.orgtechnology@lemmy.ml
arrow-up11.77Karrow-down1external-linkMozilla opposes Web Integrity API proposalgithub.comnarwhal@lemmy.ml to Firefox@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square214fedilinkcross-posted to: degoogle@lemmy.mlbrainworms@lemm.eewebdev@programming.devprivacy@lemmy.mlfirefox@lemmy.mlfirefox@fedia.iotechnology@beehaw.orgtechnology@lemmy.ml
minus-squaregrue@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-21 year ago “Don’t work at all” in Firefox, when Chrome implements the DRM the service insists upon and Firefox doesn’t and “Don’t work at all” because the services can’t exist without DRM are very different assertions. I think you’re (rightfully!) doubting the latter, but the person you replied to meant the former.
and
are very different assertions.
I think you’re (rightfully!) doubting the latter, but the person you replied to meant the former.