QAnon didn’t receive attention from the UN though, so falun gong case carry more weight.
If you say falun gong organ harvesting didn’t happen, why don’t you (or other people in this thread that keep denying it) provide any source to prove your point instead of downvoting?
Here’s a question: can you even name another Asian cult?
Turns out, a mostly Western construct whose leadership is mostly dominated by the West doesn’t understand Eastern culture. No one worth a damn in Eastern countries gives a fuck about what Falun Gong says.
If you want a real human rights violation to be outraged by, look at the Muslim crackdown in China. That has actual, verifiable evidence.
If you want a real human rights violation to be outraged by, look at the Muslim crackdown in China. That has actual, verifiable evidence.
China’s “crackdown” isn’t specifically anti-Muslim, as proven by the supposed targeting of Uyghurs despite the Hui ethnic group being the largest Muslim majority ethnic group (but this makes sense if we take into context that the Uyghur ethnic group is the largest in Xinjiang (UAR), in which China is performing anti-extremist action due to U.S. supported terrorism (see p. 271 of Paul Williams’ Operation Gladio) in the region). This doesn’t bode well for your “outrage”, but I’d like to see your actual, verifiable evidence of human rights violations nonetheless.
If you say falun gong organ harvesting didn’t happen, why don’t you (or other people in this thread that keep denying it) provide any source to prove your point instead of downvoting?
How do you expect someone to prove a negative? What sort of evidence would you like that proves that something didn’t happen?
Same way like people accused of murder and organ harvesting defending themselves. Prove that those people are still alive, autopsy proof that the deceased still have their organ intact, etc. Am I supposed to just take your word as truth without asking for proof? That would make just as bad as antivaxers or climate change deniers.
QAnon didn’t receive attention from the UN though, so falun gong case carry more weight.
If you say falun gong organ harvesting didn’t happen, why don’t you (or other people in this thread that keep denying it) provide any source to prove your point instead of downvoting?
Here’s a question: can you even name another Asian cult?
Turns out, a mostly Western construct whose leadership is mostly dominated by the West doesn’t understand Eastern culture. No one worth a damn in Eastern countries gives a fuck about what Falun Gong says.
If you want a real human rights violation to be outraged by, look at the Muslim crackdown in China. That has actual, verifiable evidence.
China’s “crackdown” isn’t specifically anti-Muslim, as proven by the supposed targeting of Uyghurs despite the Hui ethnic group being the largest Muslim majority ethnic group (but this makes sense if we take into context that the Uyghur ethnic group is the largest in Xinjiang (UAR), in which China is performing anti-extremist action due to U.S. supported terrorism (see p. 271 of Paul Williams’ Operation Gladio) in the region). This doesn’t bode well for your “outrage”, but I’d like to see your actual, verifiable evidence of human rights violations nonetheless.
How do you expect someone to prove a negative? What sort of evidence would you like that proves that something didn’t happen?
Same way like people accused of murder and organ harvesting defending themselves. Prove that those people are still alive, autopsy proof that the deceased still have their organ intact, etc. Am I supposed to just take your word as truth without asking for proof? That would make just as bad as antivaxers or climate change deniers.
You want someone to… prove a negative? I bet you also believe in God, huh?
All I ask is a reputable source that say all those horrible stuff didn’t happen and so far none of you provides one except for downvotes.
Would you also like a reputable source claiming God doesn’t exist?