• Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t get what generative ai could add to my browsing experience. How ever I do think it makes a good search engine.

    • noodlejetski@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      a “search engine” that hallucinates results, including but not limited to non-existent court cases.

      • Fizz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        And what? Half the shit on Google is completely wrong as well.

        • noodlejetski@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Google actually pulls results from web pages.

          you know how some smartphone keyboards predict the next word that you’re going to use, and you can form a comprehensible sentence that sometimes even makes sense by simply tapping the next word on the prediction bar over and over? that’s what those language models do. they don’t actually search for anything, they just create sequences of words that sound probable.

          • Fizz@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It seems that Bing chat bot searches then reads the results and gives you the answer.

            I know it’s basically predictive text but if the prompt contains a relevant info then the predictive text is likely to be the answer you’re looking for so it works well.

        • Bloonface@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah but you can tell from the context that search results are just a list of random web pages that maybe what Google says is bollocks.

          Google gives you a bunch of results and says “here, look at these”. LLMs confidently tell you things that they may have simply made up and present them as if they’re real.

    • codus@leby.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d use some sort of generative “find on page” or “summarize page” where I could have a quick Q/A without needing to read a long article.

  • bbbhltz@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sheesh, Opera remember when Opera was the best choice for users with slow internet? Remember the great built-in email client and XMPP clients? Now…this?

  • OrangeCorvus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Who gave the approval on the
    “OPE-
    RA
    ONE”

    It’s bad, really bad. If they wanted to have it split they could have at least played with it like this:
    “OP
    ERA
    ONE”
    Make it sound like the new browser is OP and it’s the era of ONE, One Opera. But you know, whatever.

  • DarkThoughts@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I already don’t trust a Chinese browser in of itself, so I’m sure as hell not going to trust a Chinese browser with an integrated AI.

  • blobcat@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    They changed the UI a bit, added 2 useless features and called it a day. Who the hell needs 5 different browsers?

  • bankimu@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Am game as long as the AI runs locally, and doesn’t siphon every website I visit to their server.