My biggest complaint was how thin the allegory was. Like, Orwell didn’t have to use animal farms at all, it read like a history lesson for most parts. I felt between chapter 3 to chapter 8 were mostly just boring and pigs Doing a power capture slowly. Did chapter 3 to 8 help create the impact of chapter 9 and 10? Absolutely. Could they have been done better? I think so, it didn’t have to be read like a history lesson.

  • jaded_genie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    What did you not enjoy? The content or style it was written? I didn’t get that part.

    To me animal farm is still among the absolutely best books I have ever set my eyes on. Not for the reason it was written: communism, power. No, the very picture that it paints using animals: they are used and then discarded.

    Looking at it at face value, this is happening in both communism and capitalism. It is a feature of how we organize our societies.

    For me the book has never been a criticism of communism. But an eye opener how we use and abuse the world around us for our own benefit, no matter in which ideology we fall.

    • cinoreus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      It’s was a critique of authoritarianism, using example of communist ideologies, in my opinion.

      I didn’t like the style, like in history textbooks, how they gloss over minute details? That’s what I felt about animal farm. Like, it felt like most of the animal farm was written by a distant observer, not someone who lives on the farm. Most notably the book lacked first person dialogues. It was almost entirely written in indirect speech, except for a few moments.

      • lifeinlarkhall@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        I think that’s kinda the point of allegories - they are timeless and open to interpretation. People read animal farm and can apply it to various parts of society, politics, philosophy. If it was too detailed and specific it would be MORE like a history book and just about the Russian Revolution. Which would likely not have had such a wide reach as it continues to have.

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        I feel it is more about the human tendendcy toward authoritarianism. Like initially after throwing off the humans there are many improvements but they get slowly degraded. Actually maybe kinda about nationalism and such. Some see the issues and others blindly following the movement.