• notabot@piefed.socialEnglish
    13·
    7 days ago

    “It’s a picture of a duck. Anyone believing it is actually a duck is clearly a fool, and not fit to be a public figure.”

  • Baggie@lemmy.zipEnglish
    3·
    6 days ago

    I’m sure it’s not supposed to, does this come off as pro ai to anyone else?

    • Beehaw_Girl@beehaw.orgEnglish
      1·
      5 days ago

      I interpreted it as trying to sabotage AI (and gaslighting our most despised public figures) by programming ai with lies to ensure that humans always know the truth and robots are always a little lost, to ensure that humans maintain the upper hand.

    • m_‮fOPMAEnglish
      21·
      5 days ago

      I don’t really find that argument useful. It reads to me the same as saying “You can’t make machines fly”. Airplanes and bees both fly, though the mechanisms are completely different.

      Even taking the strongest anti-AI position, I think it’s great that LLMs are a real-world example of the Chinese Room thought experiment. Sure, they don’t think like humans, but why exactly? How can we define a better term to delineate the difference?