• Kernel@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    While I don’t like neutering an artist’s vision in the name of conformity or commercial pressure, it’s generally a wise business practice to avoid deliberately offending your potential audience. I suppose a healthy gaming franchise needs new users to thrive, and maybe toning down the excess will broaden the game’s appeal.

    • megabucks@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      That video you shared was great!

      I agree that neutering an artist’s vision is almost always a mistake, but I wonder if the artist’s vision has changed with the times as well? Furthermore, with patches, updates, downloadable content, and expansion packs for games, at what point is a game, as a work of art, complete?

      How do you even begin to preserve a work of art when it is constantly changing and evolving?

          • Senicar@social.cyb3r.dog
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            One character is explicitly underage and sexually assaulted in game. Another is the “she died young and is a ghost so she just LOOKS young but she’s actually way older” trope.

  • smart_boy@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    While I have no clear opinion on this, it’s hilarious that people who have had over 11 years to purchase the game, often at extreme discounts or in bundles, are rising up to proclaim that they won’t be buying this game. Damn dude! I’m sure the developers are sweating bullets!

  • Kernel@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    As long as the originals remain accessible in some capacity for posterity, developers should be free to craft their evolving IP however they see fit. I’d just hope Reverge Labs is doing this because it’s genuinely where they want to take the series.

    On a day-to-day level, most of us censor what we say in order to conform to social norms. If someone holds unpopular views, they are unlikely to share them with people they don’t trust. But this is not what we mean by ‘self-censorship’, but rather ‘social filter’ that we all practice, and for good reason. The danger is when this ‘social filter’ is slowly expanded to cover more and more issues, increasing self-censorship and further silencing speech and public debate.

    https://www.liberties.eu/en/stories/self-censorship/43569