Go figure the people who could afford slaves 200 years ago could also afford to run for political office. Explains quite a few things about the events of that era.
And probably were more likely because they wanted to be in control to maintain slavery.
Not suprised. A lot of people in the US have ancestral links to slavery. I don’t judge a person for the sins of their parents. I judge them for their own sins.
Let’s be clear on this, if you have ancestors that lived in the U.S. over 150 years ago and had any wealth in the first half of the 19th century or earlier, you are likely descended from slave owners. This is just a sad fact of our history and it seems to be being used for political means. It’s just as accurate to say that all of those legislators come from old money.
Maybe I’m being a little sensitive due to knowing that my family also owned slaves at one point - and having had that sinking feeling when meeting someone of African descent that shares my last name knowing how they likely got it. But I feel like this article minimizes the truth. Slaves weren’t just owned by the ancestors of political elites. I get that’s not stated that way, but it’s important to remember that almost 1 in 5 people were slaves by the time slavery was abolished.
