• niucllos@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Tariffs in general aren’t inherently bad if they protect domestic interests, especially against a foreign power that is subsidizing production as part of an economic power play. If Trump had limited his tariffs to China and Russia not included all of our allies I would have agreed with him. If we didn’t desperately need more EVs and if US automakers weren’t such colossal assholes about making good cheap EVs I’d agree with this one

    • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      We don’t “desperately” need more EVs. But if you want more domestically produced EVs for some reason, you nationalize the auto-industry and mandate them. Tariffs in capitalism just mean that the protected industries increase profits on the same or even less supply.

    • Omgarm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Not particulary in favor of Biden specifically but the left tweet doesn’t say tarrifs are bad per se, just on who the burden lands. Apparently that knowledge does not stop him from implementing them.

      • Alsephina@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Of course. These tariffs are just to protect the US capitalists’ profits. At the expense of the working class as always.

        • rbn@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          While that’s correct, it’s also correct that the society including the working class benefits from locally produced products as they increase the local rather than international cashflow.

          But of course, the main profiteers will be the higher ups.

  • underwire212@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m determined to ensure the higher prices pass to consumers, thereby making alternative energy more expensive and thus less in demand, thus raising demand for oil and gas

    Is that what you meant Biden?

  • FuckyWucky [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I don’t agree with either, tbh. I don’t support the latest tweet because I don’t believe America needs to “lead the world” in EVs or solar panels, it’s American exceptionalist nonsense.

    Also, tariffs don’t necessarily mean American people pay for it. China doesn’t pay for tariffs, obviously. They can sell to other countries or for domestic use instead if Americans don’t wish to import their goods.

    If the tariffs are imposed along with an increased state role in domestic production of EVs and solar panels, with proper planning like China did, the U.S. could achieve domestic production of the same quality in long run.

    But in reality, there won’t be any proper planning. The U.S. government is incompetent. So, you’ll end up having inferior, overpriced cars.

    • underwire212@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Yes, and they know that. Manufacturing doesn’t spring up over night. As soon as alternative energy starts planning to build domestically, they can instantly reverse the tariffs thus reducing domestic demand.

      This is all a play to protect one of the administration’s biggest constituents; oil and gas.

  • delirious_owl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Wheres the tarrifs on things that are killing us, Joe? Where’s the carbon tax?

  • Ozone6363@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    What?

    These 2 tweets are NOT at odds with one another, what the fuck?

    In the first he is poking fun at Trumps misunderstanding of Tariffs, who pays them, and their purpose.

    In the second tweet he says he is using Tariffs to protect our countries interests in those industries.

    He doesn’t imply who pays them… can you read? Do you understand what you’re looking at?

    He is implying that putting a 100% tarrif on cheap dogshit EV’s made with near literal slave labor negates China’s unfair advantage. Not to mention the Chinese stole the fuck out of the IP required to make them.

    Do you like our intellectual property being stolen from us, manufactured via worker exploitation, and then sold back to us on the cheap? If not, you shouldn’t be against this shit.

    Fuck man.

    • macabrett[they/them]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      He is implying that putting a 100% tarrif on cheap dogshit EV’s made with near literal slave labor negates China’s unfair advantage. Not to mention the Chinese stole the fuck out of the IP required to make them.

      You’ve invented a completely new reality (none of this is stated in the tweet) while claiming the same of the original post.

    • krolden@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Lol “our intellectual property”? Its not yours and never will be. Enjoy slobbering that capitalist knob