• @delirious_owl
      link
      14
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      I did. Saved up for years and then finally pulled the trigger.

      It broke after about a week of use and took them about a year to give me a partial refund.

    • @colourlesspony@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      919 days ago

      There shtick is privacy. They are selling privacy oriented machines which is a value add for people who need device privacy but don’t have the bandwidth to to setup and audit everything themselves. The service they are selling is more privacy then value budget hardware.

    • @pr06lefs@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      619 days ago

      pricing is in line with the top ipad. I consider it kind of an activist move to buy one of these though, more about supporting a cause than getting a device with maximal functionality.

      • @darkphotonstudio@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        318 days ago

        With prices like this, it’s kind of performative activism though. It severely limits access and makes it like privacy is a luxury only a few can afford. That’s a weird message to be sending out.

  • @ulkesh@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1219 days ago

    From what I’ve read and listened to, they’re misleading in this report when they say all crowdfunding backer devices have been fulfilled/delivered.

      • @ulkesh@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        117 days ago

        I feel that pain, but probably not to the same degree. I’ve backed over 300 campaigns on Kickstarter and Gamefound. I’ve had around 8 that didn’t fulfill and didn’t give a refund – somewhere in the vicinity of $500-800 worth overall. It’s maddening when it feels like our money was either stolen or at best, wasted.

        • @benneti@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          117 days ago

          True, i kinda only ordered it to support mobile Linux development, however, by now I think there would have been much better places to do this than this company.

          • @ulkesh@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            217 days ago

            I’m sorry you’re having to deal with that – especially for a technology we’d all like to see in that space to provide good competition to the main two. Thanks for your efforts to push that forward!

  • @delirious_owl
    link
    1219 days ago

    Wow, looks like there is profit to be made in scamming

  • @ericjmorey@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    1119 days ago

    I like the ethos behind Purism, I was worried they wouldn’t be profitable at all. I hope this is enough profitablity to attract greater investment to grow and create economies of scale and lower the retail price and reduce lead times to be in line with the rest of the market.

  • YⓄ乙
    link
    fedilink
    English
    618 days ago

    Heard this company was involved in major scams

  • @millie@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    419 days ago

    It would be nice if companies like this came out with a budget model so more people could participate in supporting their products. Lotta poor folks into FOSS.

  • Vodulas [they/them]
    link
    fedilink
    319 days ago

    I was just having a conversation about a Google free, AI Free phone option. This isn’t quite where the folks I was talking to need it to be (mostly needs eSim and 5G would be nice), but it certainly something to keep an eye on.