Medieval? They went to the planet on generational ships to build an instaportal back to earth. The mechs are controlled by fully immersive simulators.

And in DCC they’re fighting with swords and bows as well as spells, with the tech and aliens. The parallels are there.

Same humor, same writing style, same tempo, yes it’s not in the same universe and lacking the “RPG” parts, if that’s what you meant. It could almost be one of the levels at this point.

Operation Bounce House by Matt Dinniman. It’s got the same feel as Dungeon Crawler Carl. Enjoying it so far as well, after this it’s book 2 of the Corellian Trilogy. Hopefully the proofreading in this one is better.

On the other hand, setting the printing press could also introduce typos as well that wasn’t in the draft.

It’s definitely not easy to print literature.

And that’s also not entirely what I’ve heard, some authors do their own proofreading and that’s it, so each publisher probably does their own thing too.

Another user mentioned Crichton as well, said theirs was Canibal, does that ring anything?

Not exactly a typo, but still amazing.

That’s almost as bad retconning Han shooting first.

I can “forgive” a couple myself as well, but this was so jarring it’s basically immersion breaking.

I believe some authors self proofread, but you would think larger company like Bantam would want to do their own for QA.

I wonder if that’s the same book the other user can’t think of.

It does get me thinking sometimes, one thing I’ve russled around is that scifi could be harder, it’s not as easy to rely to the spellcheck in Word for example. Lots of throwaway words. Simpler when writing specificly about earth and history.

But most of the books I read predate that as well, how common place was Word in 94, and would a good portion of authors use it?

That’s awesome, I love when authors have a bit of “sass” or flair like that.

Characters name is Jacen, not Jcen

Gonig instead of going

Glas instead of glass

Should be walked not talked

Capital I in give

That’s from his Galactic Empire series

The TV show is about his broader Foundation universe, so has Galactic Empire and Robot stories and lore too.

Not essentially, Asimov combined his three series (robots, foundation, and empire) and a few other short stories and novels into one universe 30 years after with with foundation follow-ups. There’s a few continuity errors since it wasn’t planned like that from the start.

Link

One of my favorite authors and series.

lol, never put some stuff in a mud room for storage? The one thing looks like it could be a smoker, pull it in out of weather.

So a mud room. It’s a small room to remove dirty/wet clothes. If it’s the back door, not unheard of for there to be a balcony porch type area too.

A mud room.

I responded to someone’s comment about a post link you muppet, how is that not on topic! Lmfao, you truly are a special one.

Everyone but you has been able to follow along, you’re the only one dude, so who’s the troll?

This community truly has some of the most ridiculous and ignorant users.

How am I trolling for answering your concerns? You’re the one whinging and bitching, and not contributing to the conversation, those are what a troll does.

Take the L and go home.

If the point you’re making isn’t that all pathways should be road wide, you’re doing a shit job of it, and not answering questions or providing information so you can help be steered to the right information.

And for the last time, road cyclists aren’t the only ones out there. If you make the track for road cyclists so they can fast, it’s useless for anyone else since it’s not safe. Meaning you’re making it for one group of people only…. Like I’ve said.

I’m not ignoring context, I’ve explained everything multiple times, you just refuse to listen.

And unless you’re in a large group and clustered together (which in stupid and dangerous) you don’t need more than a regular multi use pathway. Why do you think you need 12 feet of width to make massively large sweeping turns?

Like you’re doing in this chain with a post link you’re ignoring that started this whole topic….?

I’ve addressed your concerns, you’re saying these trails need to be road wide, I provided reasons why they don’t need to be. Just because you don’t like the answers doesn’t mean I’m here in bad faith. It just means you have a bias and are the one not wanting to discuss something, you just want to be heard and your view is the only one.

Yes, but with all the construction equipment already there, it’s a fraction of the cost to build it alongside. Also that way you can wildlife protect it along with the highway. A seperate route would be at risk of animals (and need to be wary of migration paths) or need its own protection and animal crossovers.