Why not promote piefed?
Why not promote piefed?
deleted by creator
Ceasefire being announced vs ceasefire being agreed to seem to be separate events here. If there are more attacks after the agreement is officially made, you’ll have been proven correct.
People here are satisfied with using the ActivityPub services and content with slow growth of a now sustainable but relatively small user group.
The people who want to use bsky just want a better Twitter. And bsky has delivered that. If that’s temporary, it’s better for them to use it while it lasts because Mastodon is absolutely not what those people using bsky want. Mastodon to them is technically worse than Twitter but something they may settle for if bsky wasn’t an option.
How do you obtain materials for knitting? Your choice is political.
Why did you choose to participate in !crochet@lemmy.ca? That was a political choice.
Unfortunately everything is inherently political, but I can see the value of an instance that favors mainstream low controversial content.
Federation and decentralization is not what the users of bsky want. It’s (for some) a nice to have thing but way down on the list of what they value.
Were you able to implement it?
I agree with most of what you said, just wanted to let you know that the tone wasn’t optimal for facilitating understanding.
Have a nice weekend.
You seem to have take a very uncharitable interpretation of this post.
That’s awesome!
Thanks!
Not that I can tell.
Lemmy needs to allow communities to ignore the votes of non-subscribed users. It should be the default setting that a community owner can override. But it will never happen. So the lemmy ecosystem will remain not very diverse in its user base unless there are multiple clusters of federated instances that are not (widely) federated with the other clusters.
Hopefully Sublinks can get to production and implement this.
This is what people didn’t want. But it was inevitable that eventually that people would stop complaining about the newest iteration of this.
Yup. This is why Discord/Whatsapp/Telegram are so popular, for better or worse.
I wish that gained some traction.
I also wish it had a name that is easy to intuit a pronunciation.
When I want to have back and forth between people on a regular basis, I choose chat apps. Mastodon feels like it’s trying to be a poorly designed chat app.
It feels like your summary missed the lesson of the study. Don’t share the misinformation at all. Otherwise, you’re helping the spread of misinformation.
I do worry that they’ll run out of money before they can do the work to let the ecosystem become sustainable by itself.
I’m mildly concerned about this as well.
Thanks for the link.