

Also, just going from the quotes in the article, it seems like this author is attacking an argument nobody is actually making. This article says we can’t dismiss the possibility that this could happen, but the FDA is saying it already definitely did happen and the researchers are saying it didn’t, which is a whole different conversation and all the currently available evidence points to the researchers being 100% correct about it.















Actually, it’s even worse than that, the FDA clown is saying some children have died, not may have. The author just ignores all of that to so he can get on his “you ivory tower academics are too close minded!” soap box.