(That’s the left.)
- 120 Posts
- 9.55K Comments
mindbleach@sh.itjust.worksto
Lord Of The Rings Memes@piefed.social•Until I watch the animated LOTR from the 70s one day, this is what I'll assume it's like.
3·2 days agoTrue. Bugs and Daffy would be Merry and Pippin.
mindbleach@sh.itjust.worksto
PC Gaming@lemmy.ca•'Turns out having your game be free on Epic is great advertising for Steam sales': New Blood chief says Blood West sold 'like 200% more' the day it was a freebie on EGSEnglish
2·2 days agoEmpty insults mean less than nothing.
mindbleach@sh.itjust.worksto
PC Gaming@lemmy.ca•'Turns out having your game be free on Epic is great advertising for Steam sales': New Blood chief says Blood West sold 'like 200% more' the day it was a freebie on EGSEnglish
11·3 days agoEpic offering a game for free, only to be treated as advertisement for its sale on Steam, is the headline of this submission. What do you mean, what? Do you speak English?
I’ve demonstrated I keep notes on these arguments. Not that it seems to matter, when even the people who agree that Steam is a monopoly pile on, like I’m the asshole for pointing it out. I have asked you, specifically, what I should say differently, and your response was ‘well I dunno.’ Great! Thanks! How distinctly useful!
You changed it to Latrine?
mindbleach@sh.itjust.worksto
PC Gaming@lemmy.ca•'Turns out having your game be free on Epic is great advertising for Steam sales': New Blood chief says Blood West sold 'like 200% more' the day it was a freebie on EGSEnglish
12·3 days agoIf I have demonstrated anything in all my years online, it is that I am ready and willing to argue. But it’s not an argument if the other side is just saying words recreationally. That seems to be the case here, when no amount of pleading for specifics or alternatives results in anything besides ‘shut up.’
Meanwhile:
The actual topic remains that Valve is a monopoly. In what universe is that not relevant to this article about their largest competitor being so unimportant they can’t give things away? If everyone here takes that for granted, great… so why am I getting the same response as the many times people deny it? Even the meta discussion about phrasing is fraught and confrontational, regardless of what I’ve actually said. Have I offended you in some way?
mindbleach@sh.itjust.worksto
PC Gaming@lemmy.ca•'Turns out having your game be free on Epic is great advertising for Steam sales': New Blood chief says Blood West sold 'like 200% more' the day it was a freebie on EGSEnglish
12·3 days agoIf you want to warn, then warn directly
What would that look like, besides what I’ve done?
I don’t think any of you know what you want. You act like I’ve done something wrong, and when pressed on what exactly that is, you cannot provide a reason, but will not re-examine the assertion. Any amount of context is the wrong amount, any approach is the wrong approach, any tone is the wrong tone. The nature of bad faith is that there is no right answer.
And this is over agreement. I’m used to people getting weird when they insist Steam isn’t an obvious monopoly. The exact same weirdness becomes novel when it’s from people insisting it’s too obvious. I’m getting shit on both for explaining why being a monopoly is not intrinsically evil, and for explaining why we should be concerned about them anyway… and I’m getting shit on as though I did neither of those things… in the same comment. Baffling.
mindbleach@sh.itjust.worksto
PC Gaming@lemmy.ca•'Turns out having your game be free on Epic is great advertising for Steam sales': New Blood chief says Blood West sold 'like 200% more' the day it was a freebie on EGSEnglish
13·3 days agoThey said, continuing to make this about me, instead of the actual topic.
Still offering a fat lot of nothing in terms of constructive criticism for this tone-policing.
mindbleach@sh.itjust.worksto
PC Gaming@lemmy.ca•'Turns out having your game be free on Epic is great advertising for Steam sales': New Blood chief says Blood West sold 'like 200% more' the day it was a freebie on EGSEnglish
13·3 days agoPeople fall over themselves to demonstrate what I’m saying.
I mention that it’s a monopoly - ‘shut up, no it isn’t.’ I mention the people who say it isn’t - ‘shut up, of course it is.’ I start from scratch - ‘shut up, what are you talking about.’ I provide two years of context - ‘shut up, that’s not in this thread.’
What sequence of words would avoid this abuse? What possible sentence would address the actual issue, without people acting like I’ve insulted their mother’s cooking?
mindbleach@sh.itjust.worksto
PC Gaming@lemmy.ca•'Turns out having your game be free on Epic is great advertising for Steam sales': New Blood chief says Blood West sold 'like 200% more' the day it was a freebie on EGSEnglish
11·3 days agoThen it’s not a me problem. And you shouldn’t act like it is.
mindbleach@sh.itjust.worksto
PC Gaming@lemmy.ca•'Turns out having your game be free on Epic is great advertising for Steam sales': New Blood chief says Blood West sold 'like 200% more' the day it was a freebie on EGSEnglish
13·3 days agoEven when I ask what should I say instead?, people go ‘ooh, no, I wouldn’t say it like that’ instead of answering the fucking question.
I’ve had this argument in a wide variety of contexts and tones-of-voice. All of them get the same asinine responses. This goes beyond resting bitch font, where people interpret whatever I write in the shittiest way possible. I’m starting to think the topic is just cursed. Like it’s impossible to have a sensible conversation about Valve’s market share. All efforts descend into snipping about the commenter, or spiral out into nonsense and denial.
I beg of you, prove me wrong. What should I say instead?
mindbleach@sh.itjust.worksto
PC Gaming@lemmy.ca•'Turns out having your game be free on Epic is great advertising for Steam sales': New Blood chief says Blood West sold 'like 200% more' the day it was a freebie on EGSEnglish
15·4 days agoAnd which angle would not receive the same “information?”
mindbleach@sh.itjust.worksto
Libertarian Discussion@sh.itjust.works•Keep New Hampshire Red - Representative Michael Granger (Liberty Caucus Member)English
5·4 days agoI am not sure how that’s related
You lack object permanence.
Different premise, similar outcome, it’s fairly close to The High Crusade by Poul Anderson. Aliens invade medieval England and get shanked, ultimately leading to the British empire spanning the galaxy.
mindbleach@sh.itjust.worksto
Libertarian Discussion@sh.itjust.works•Keep New Hampshire Red - Representative Michael Granger (Liberty Caucus Member)English
5·4 days agoFuck off with your finger-curling argument. ‘Oh is it a crime to go like this?’ Sir, you shot your wife.
There are stormtroopers in the streets, murdering people with impunity, and this cunt pushes a video titled ‘the party doing that is better, because freeeedommm.’
mindbleach@sh.itjust.worksto
Libertarian Discussion@sh.itjust.works•Keep New Hampshire Red - Representative Michael Granger (Liberty Caucus Member)English
2·4 days agoMask-off fascist.




They’re just going to town, sir.