• 84 Posts
  • 4.74K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 6th, 2023

help-circle


  • tetris11@lemmy.mltoComic Strips@lemmy.worldxRule
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    I think its more murky than that.

    There was a whole story arc about mutant growth hormone, which was derived from skin cells scraped off people like the Owl and other supers.

    This MGH gave humans temporary mutant powers, and cites its origin as the X-Gene.

    Confusingly though, it still tries to draw an arbitrary distinction between inherited mutants and somatic ones.

    Origin

    While it is most of the time extracted from mutants, it can also be extracted/synthesized from other super-powered individuals, but the source of their superpowers must alter their genetic make-up. For example, the Owl or Spider-Woman are not mutants, but their powers come from genetic mutations, and they were both used as MGH sources.

    My understanding of this, is that anyone who has a non-fatal mutation of their X-factor gene develops mutant powers and abilities and, if permanent, becomes a mutant.

    “Traditional” mutants inherit the X-factor, and are mutants from birth. That’s the only distinction I can see, and seems like a bit of a weak distinction tbh.





  • tetris11@lemmy.mltoComic Strips@lemmy.worldxRule
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Even within Marvel, is he genuinely not a mutant? I swear I’ve read a comic where he suspects that the substance that blinded him, not only sharpened his other senses but even made him smarter to some degree. Sure, Stick honed his senses, so there’s a self-development aspect of it too, and his parents might have not carried the X-gene or whatever it is, but ultimately his powers comes from a mutation in his DNA no?










  • tetris11@lemmy.mltomemes@lemmy.worldMoans
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    This raises the good question of whether masochists need consent in some situations

    Edit: from the severe negative feedback, I presume then that user pzzzt has legitimate cause to feel attacked, and that user Kevo is false in their presumption that this is a good thing for them. Or we might all be overreacting to some risqué banter. Real thinker.