A Florida man is facing 20 counts of obscenity for allegedly creating and distributing AI-generated child pornography, highlighting the danger and ubiquity of generative AI being used for nefarious reasons.

Phillip Michael McCorkle was arrested last week while he was working at a movie theater in Vero Beach, Florida, according to TV station CBS 12 News. A crew from the TV station captured the arrest, which made for dramatic video footage due to law enforcement leading away the uniform-wearing McCorkle from the theater in handcuffs.

  • @aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    -1
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    Another thing that you “can’t we think of the poor, helpless pedos that want to nut?” people don’t seem to think of is that if AI CSAM grows increasingly more realistic and we carve out an exception for it, how can you enforce laws against non-generated CSAM? You’d have to have some computer forensics asshole involved in every case to prove whether or not the images are generated, which would likely produce a chilling effect over time on regular CSAM cases, and all of this for the “societal benefit” of allowing pedos a more gratifying wank.

    • @Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      322 days ago

      For the societal benefit of not ceding our rights to government.

      Today it’s pedophilia, but what about if Trump wins and legally designates trans people as pedophiles?

      This is a power we cannot allow the government to have.

      • @aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        -122 days ago

        For the societal benefit of not ceding our rights to government.

        The right to create realistic looking CSAM is not a right I give a shit about having.

        Today it’s pedophilia, but what about if Trump wins and legally designates trans people as pedophiles?

        What if a lawless dictator does crazy things? I’m not sure the law (or lack thereof) will have anything to do with that scenario.

        The whole idea of “if X is illegal, then the government will use the law against X against us” only matters in the context of a government following the law.

        If they’re willing to color outside the lines and the courts say the law doesn’t apply to them then it doesn’t matter one fucking bit.

        • @Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          222 days ago

          I’m not suggesting they’ll abandon the rule of law. I’m suggesting they’ll use this as precedent to legally oppress us.

            • @Cryophilia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              222 days ago

              Which is a terrible excuse for allowing bad laws. Sure, ok, let’s assume you’re right and this specific group will break the law anyway. Maybe let’s prepare for other tyrannical groups?

              • @aesthelete@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                022 days ago

                Other tyrannical groups that also won’t follow the law? I don’t think laws will “prepare” for those either.

                • @Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  322 days ago

                  Well then why even have laws?

                  I’m talking about the extremely common scenario in history where the government makes an unjust law and then follows it, so their persecution is totally legal.