The Washington Free Beacon posted a hilarious hitpiece on Vice President Kamala Harris this morning. It’s a three-reporter byline, featured prominently on their website, and heavily promoted by its editors.

Their big scoop: HARRIS LEFT HER JOB AT McDONALDS OFF HER RESUME. PICS OR IT DIDN’T HAPPEN!!!

Yes, for real.

These dipshits are doing GOTCHAS by digging up Harris’s post-college and law school resumes and pointing out that she left off a few weeks working the deep fryer between her freshman and sophomore years at Howard University. This hard-hitting investigation is just asking questions about why the Vice President didn’t mention the McDonalds gig when she applied to be a summer law clerk at the Alameda County District Attorney’s Office in 1987. Instead, she included stints at Charles Schwab, the FTC, a senate internship, and clerking at a law firm.

  • @KRAW@linux.community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -2720 days ago

    there is simply no dirt on her

    Listen, I’m backing the Harris campaign 100%, but if you look at the history of San Francisco area politicians, you will see that very few are “clean.” I would not be surprised if it was the same for her.

      • @noride@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        3120 days ago

        I heard she also didn’t list any of her childhood lemonade stands on her IRS 1040 form. 🫢

        • Like, I’m not super excited about some of Harris’ likely policy positions, but the shit they’re trying to attack her on is laughable. Their opposition research team must be coming up with jack shit.

      • @KRAW@linux.community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -17
        edit-2
        20 days ago

        Nope. However she has ties to Willie Brown, who is a notoriously corrupt politician in the San Francisco area. It’s a “where there is smoke…” situation. My point is not to assert that she has dirt but to point out that declaring there is no dirt might be a bit dubious.

          • @Hazzia@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            12
            edit-2
            20 days ago

            Also: “has connections to” has essentially no weight in this context. Unless there are personal ties or frequent contacts with this person (which OP definitely did not indicate), then it could be as little as “had a business interaction because their professional lives are related”.

            Shit I could say Biden “has connections to” Donald Trump because they ran against each other

            • @KRAW@linux.community
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -520 days ago

              Lol, they literally dated right before her political career started. I see you didn’t do the minimum effort to even look into what I was talking about.

              • @Hazzia@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                520 days ago

                Yeah not for nothing but I’m not gonna bother researching a vague comment like “has ties to” from a random person on the internet to try and discern what they’re talking about. If so I’d be up to my ears trying to figure out who all those people that Trump is refering to when he says “people are saying”

              • @KRAW@linux.community
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -4
                edit-2
                20 days ago

                She would not be the first to be corrupted by his influence.. It also doesn’t help that his proteges have all been running SF local government for years. It seems insane to me to dismiss their relationship as not a concern. It’s not a dealbreaker for me, but it seems absurd to think she is “squeaky clean” in light of it. I can be pro-Harris and express some critiques.

        • @CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          17 days ago

          A politician who worked in the same town as another politician might have interacted with that person? Wow. I am scandalized.