@ouch@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.ml • 4 days agoVPS encryptionmessage-square35fedilinkarrow-up165arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up163arrow-down1message-squareVPS encryption@ouch@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.ml • 4 days agomessage-square35fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@Zikeji@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglish5•4 days agoLUKS, or anything that relies on the server encrypting, is highly vulnerable (see schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business’s response). Your best bet would be encrypting client side before it arrives on the server using a solution like rclone, restic, borg, etc.
minus-square@boredsquirrel@slrpnk.netlinkfedilink2•4 days agoYes. No proof their LUKS prompt isnt tampered with
LUKS, or anything that relies on the server encrypting, is highly vulnerable (see schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business’s response).
Your best bet would be encrypting client side before it arrives on the server using a solution like rclone, restic, borg, etc.
Yes. No proof their LUKS prompt isnt tampered with