• @MajorHavoc@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    92 days ago

    Yeah. I don’t mind snap at all for cases where a better package doesn’t exist.

    What made me give up Ubuntu was how it railroaded me into snap versions of packages that work better, for me, as native .deb installs.

    • @UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 days ago

      Oh definitely. Canonical forcing us to use snap Firefox was very shitty. I mean I still use Ubuntu because I’m lazy, but I did change the snap Firefox thing to the apt libraries or whatever.

      I really don’t understand why they don’t just adopt flatpak.

      • @lengau@midwest.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I don’t believe Flatpak has the ability to package something like node. It certainly can’t package kernels or system services (at least not without leaving the user with a ton of manual work to do that would make it not much better than getting a tarball).