• nek0d3r@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    Except this isn’t money going to a FOSS project, it’s money to some guys whose only keyboard is StackOverflow’s The Key.

    • delirious_owl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      If its forked from a Foss project then its necessarily a Foss project. That’s why we use Foss licenses.

      • alt_xa_23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        Vscode is released under a MIT license and the Continue extension is released under Apache. Neither is copyleft, so the forked codebase doesn’t need to be open source

        • delirious_owl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Ah you’re right. Blame Vscode for using MIT. Maybe now is a good time to tell them to change it to GPL, so this can’t happen again.

      • nek0d3r@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Right, exactly, which is why they launched with a FOSS license. Oh, wait–

        Imagine the money going to VSCode which actually is the one getting contributions

        • delirious_owl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          If you’re upset, just ask them for the source. If they don’t respond, sue.

          In any case, we’re all going to get the source and we’ll all benefit from this.

          • nek0d3r@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            The source is literally just VSCode with a different label. What benefit does that have?