• delirious_owl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    If its forked from a Foss project then its necessarily a Foss project. That’s why we use Foss licenses.

    • alt_xa_23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      Vscode is released under a MIT license and the Continue extension is released under Apache. Neither is copyleft, so the forked codebase doesn’t need to be open source

      • delirious_owl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Ah you’re right. Blame Vscode for using MIT. Maybe now is a good time to tell them to change it to GPL, so this can’t happen again.

    • nek0d3r@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      Right, exactly, which is why they launched with a FOSS license. Oh, wait–

      Imagine the money going to VSCode which actually is the one getting contributions

      • delirious_owl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        If you’re upset, just ask them for the source. If they don’t respond, sue.

        In any case, we’re all going to get the source and we’ll all benefit from this.

        • nek0d3r@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          The source is literally just VSCode with a different label. What benefit does that have?