• @tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    11 year ago

    Yeah I see a lot of “cruelty is the point” comments here, which might not be entirely false, but if they sue it mostly means someone is pissed off about losing revenue.

    • @lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 year ago

      The cruelty isn’t the only point behind every conservative position, but it’s the only point of enough of them to make me suspect it’s part of the motivation for all of them.

        • @lolcatnip@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Really? Not for anti-trans laws, anti-immigrant laws, and laws that specifically target medically necessary abortions? Of course it’s the point. If looking at the laws they vote for isn’t good enough, all you have to do is talk to a few conservatives to figure out they’re hateful, cruel people.

          • @merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            You may see them as hateful and cruel people, but that’s not how they see themselves. They would have to see themselves as cruel for cruelty to be the point. The fact that you think it’s the point means that you’re unwilling or unable to actually understand their point of view.

            You may disagree with it, but it’s not about “cruelty”, and pretending it is just shows your personal limitations.

            • @lolcatnip@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              If course they don’t see themselves as hateful. But they have no qualms about using cruelty to enforce their idea of the proper social order. If you want to be very literal, the cruelty is the means to an end and not an end in itself, but when they use cruelty as a first resort to enforce rules to designed to keep undesirable people in their place, I see it as a distinction without a difference.