Donald Trump voters told us why billionaires have too much power.We visited a Trump rally in search of an honest conversation with Donald Trump's supporters ...
I know I’ve seen some articles on this but I can’t seem to find them again. There were studies done where they asked self identified right wing people to agree or disagree with political statements.
People were very likely to disagree with a statement like “I support universal healthcare”, but very likely to agree with statements like “I support laws which would ensure no taxpayer would enter into medical debt for obtaining necessary medical care”. Essentially, if you just described socialist ideology, without using the common words for it, a large amount of right wing people completely agreed with it.
This has been my anecdotal experience as well. Most of the time when I ask my Republican friends their opinions on specific policies I find that their views are very populist leaning toward socialist. They just happen to also be motivated by fear and easily swayed by propaganda and will readily vote against their own interests in exchange for a false sense of security.
They are then confused and frustrated when the scumbags they voted for do exactly what they said they would do and it turns out badly.
I’ve noticed the same in conversations. When I talk about socialist theory, people agree 100%, but as soon as you say a buzz word it’s, “Now I don’t want full socialism!”
But right wing also oppose government interventions to lower those prices. And no, the market will not fix itself. Some things are not bound to laws of supply and demand. When your kid is on the operation table, you’re not going to tell him « hey sorry it’s too expensive to keep you around, we’re putting you down ».
Healthcare is distributed based on who needs it most (or that’s how it should be distributed). When you go to an ED, you don’t have an auction for the next available bed, you have an RN take a look at who’s presenting with the most serious symptoms and taking them next. When you introduce a profit motive into that system, all it does is raise prices. It doesn’t make that process any more efficient. If it weren’t for government interventions, the emergency department could turn away people without insurance or an ability to pay. Laissez-faire capitalism is not what you want in healthcare.
Yes. The difference is that its corporations doing the the majority of the propagandizing rather than the government directly. But propaganda is propaganda.
That’s authoritarianism. You don’t see the CCP edging closer to a civil war based on propagated polarising. AFAIK, that’s never been achieved in human history. I’m sure it’s unlikely to happen, but between all the international targeting from Russia, China, etc. and then the US’s own media and governments, the US is soaked in propaganda more than anywhere else. Absolutely surrounded by it.
But this is the interesting part. The more someone is propagated, the less likely they are to realise it.
America doesn’t even need to do that. It just convinces people to not trust anything that doesn’t come from pre-approved sources and that works well enough.
Not to undermine jewish mythology, but people aren’t unlike golems with words put into their heads. Folks are ‘hacking’ chatbots to reveal removed-making tutorials in spite of their half-backed defences, by telling it in obscure way or adding keywords, but that always worked for people too. SPEECH skill checks are HACKING checks for biorobots. One side coded them for their benefit, but as long as you know how the program works, you can inject your own code there and vice versa.
I know I’ve seen some articles on this but I can’t seem to find them again. There were studies done where they asked self identified right wing people to agree or disagree with political statements.
People were very likely to disagree with a statement like “I support universal healthcare”, but very likely to agree with statements like “I support laws which would ensure no taxpayer would enter into medical debt for obtaining necessary medical care”. Essentially, if you just described socialist ideology, without using the common words for it, a large amount of right wing people completely agreed with it.
I remember seeing the same things a while back. This is why I always explain what I believe before I use the common words for it.
They don’t form opinions so much as inherit them from authoritarians via social pressure.
And the media. Yes I’m looking at you, Murdoch hacks.
This has been my anecdotal experience as well. Most of the time when I ask my Republican friends their opinions on specific policies I find that their views are very populist leaning toward socialist. They just happen to also be motivated by fear and easily swayed by propaganda and will readily vote against their own interests in exchange for a false sense of security.
They are then confused and frustrated when the scumbags they voted for do exactly what they said they would do and it turns out badly.
What happens when you ask them such a policy, then ask them to tell you what they think the positives and negatives of that policy would be.
Only to then call it by the name they were conditioned to hate?
Would they become angry? Start rationalizing against the points they just made? Or accept their hate isn’t justified?
I’ve noticed the same in conversations. When I talk about socialist theory, people agree 100%, but as soon as you say a buzz word it’s, “Now I don’t want full socialism!”
That could easily be assumed as an endorsement of lower health care costs, not universal health care.
But right wing also oppose government interventions to lower those prices. And no, the market will not fix itself. Some things are not bound to laws of supply and demand. When your kid is on the operation table, you’re not going to tell him « hey sorry it’s too expensive to keep you around, we’re putting you down ».
Let me just call some other hospitals, surgeons, and anesthesiologists to price shop when my kid needs surgery.
Nevermind the fact you’re further limited by the network decided by the insurance provider you don’t get to choose…
Healthcare is distributed based on who needs it most (or that’s how it should be distributed). When you go to an ED, you don’t have an auction for the next available bed, you have an RN take a look at who’s presenting with the most serious symptoms and taking them next. When you introduce a profit motive into that system, all it does is raise prices. It doesn’t make that process any more efficient. If it weren’t for government interventions, the emergency department could turn away people without insurance or an ability to pay. Laissez-faire capitalism is not what you want in healthcare.
You’re right, they’re more concerned with results rather than solutions.
deleted by creator
Americans are the most propagandized people on Earth.
More than the CCP? More than Russia? More than North Korea? Please.
Yes. The difference is that its corporations doing the the majority of the propagandizing rather than the government directly. But propaganda is propaganda.
Maybe not North Korea, but the other two? Easily.
How can you possibly say that when the CCP exerts such tight control over the parts of the Internet mainlanders are allowed to see?
That’s authoritarianism. You don’t see the CCP edging closer to a civil war based on propagated polarising. AFAIK, that’s never been achieved in human history. I’m sure it’s unlikely to happen, but between all the international targeting from Russia, China, etc. and then the US’s own media and governments, the US is soaked in propaganda more than anywhere else. Absolutely surrounded by it.
But this is the interesting part. The more someone is propagated, the less likely they are to realise it.
America doesn’t even need to do that. It just convinces people to not trust anything that doesn’t come from pre-approved sources and that works well enough.
That’s it - the stupidest thing I’ve read yet today
That is what a propagandized American would say …
True.
Not to undermine jewish mythology, but people aren’t unlike golems with words put into their heads. Folks are ‘hacking’ chatbots to reveal removed-making tutorials in spite of their half-backed defences, by telling it in obscure way or adding keywords, but that always worked for people too. SPEECH skill checks are HACKING checks for biorobots. One side coded them for their benefit, but as long as you know how the program works, you can inject your own code there and vice versa.