@tst123@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 11 months agoStreaming TV costs now higher than cable, as 'crash' finally hits9to5mac.comexternal-linkmessage-square399fedilinkarrow-up11.48Karrow-down144
arrow-up11.44Karrow-down1external-linkStreaming TV costs now higher than cable, as 'crash' finally hits9to5mac.com@tst123@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 11 months agomessage-square399fedilink
minus-square@cheesemonk@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish24•11 months agoCan they really count internet costs which most people would need even if they weren’t streaming?
minus-square@redeyejedi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish2•11 months agoGreat point. I guess there’s maybe someone that doesn’t need internet in there home. But the average person these days can’t function without it.
minus-square@_Tom_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish1•11 months agoI was doing it to try to make their claim seem sane. Are people really on 4-5 streaming services?
minus-square@cheesemonk@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish1•11 months agoThere definitely are. My partner has Netflix, Prime, Peacock, and the Disney plus bundle. I feel like it isn’t that uncommon of a scenario tbh.
Can they really count internet costs which most people would need even if they weren’t streaming?
Great point. I guess there’s maybe someone that doesn’t need internet in there home. But the average person these days can’t function without it.
I was doing it to try to make their claim seem sane. Are people really on 4-5 streaming services?
There definitely are. My partner has Netflix, Prime, Peacock, and the Disney plus bundle. I feel like it isn’t that uncommon of a scenario tbh.