OpenAI now tries to hide that ChatGPT was trained on copyrighted books, including J.K. Rowling’s Harry Potter series::A new research paper laid out ways in which AI developers should try and avoid showing LLMs have been trained on copyrighted material.

  • @Blapoo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7011 months ago

    We have to distinguish between LLMs

    • Trained on copyrighted material and
    • Outputting copyrighted material

    They are not one and the same

      • @scv
        link
        English
        2511 months ago

        Legally the output of the training could be considered a derived work. We treat brains differently here, that’s all.

        I think the current intellectual property system makes no sense and AI is revealing that fact.

      • @TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -111 months ago

        I think this brings up broader questions about the currently quite extreme interpretation of copyright. Personally I don’t think its wrong to sample from or create derivative works from something that is accessible. If its not behind lock and key, its free to use. If you have a problem with that, then put it behind lock and key. No one is forcing you to share your art with the world.

    • @Tetsuo@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 months ago

      Output from an AI has just been recently considered as not copyrightable.

      I think it stemmed from the actors strikes recently.

      It was stated that only work originating from a human can be copyrighted.