• @Astrealix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago

    How many 9.1 magnitude earthquakes do you think there are? And the reports following the disaster showed that there were definitely ways to prevent it from happening, like, for example, not building it so close to the sea.

    • PeleSpirit
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 year ago

      And do you think other countries would make smarter and wiser decisions? Dude.

      • @Astrealix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        I mean, if we want to go down that path, there’s no reason to think that governments won’t just stick to fossil fuels and fuck us all.

        Even so, it took a literal once-in-a-century earthquake in the right place to send a tsunami to the perfectly misplaced reactor to actually make just one person die. One. And two died from the aforementioned massive tsunami caused by an earthquake that occurs around once a century.

        • PeleSpirit
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -11 year ago

          I watched that in real time, more than one person died and it ruined a whole region that they’re just now sort of recovering from. It was devastating to them. You’re not even making any sense.

          • @Astrealix@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            51 year ago

            The deaths came from the, again, once-in-a-century earthquake. Evacuations, yes. Deaths, no.

            “Nobody died as a direct result of the Fukushima nuclear disaster. However, in 2018 one worker in charge of measuring radiation at the plant died of lung cancer caused by radiation exposure.” — Encyclopedia Britannica. (https://www.britannica.com/event/Fukushima-accident)