• @halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    276 months ago

    It was when the article was written. In 2018.

    No one online does even basic research anymore, like even clicking the link. Everyone just reads the headline and makes assumptions.

      • @halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        36 months ago

        The poster I responded to was clearly taking the article at face value, even ignoring the satirical nature, it’s a 5 year old article either way and not written about current events.

        A post trying to conflate a 5 year old satire article and current events is factually wrong and should be called out, even if the source is obviously satire.

        • @Doorbook@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          26 months ago

          I would disagree because it proves the fact that these actions we see today is in align with historical trends.

      • @DashboTreeFrog
        link
        English
        366 months ago

        Gallows humor. It’s sad that the general events are real but the mocking way the article and headline are written allows the reader to chuckle through the horror.

      • @11181514@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        286 months ago

        How is it in poor taste? Just because it’s real? The faux empathy for the IDF is literally the joke. It’s saying “killing babies bad”. What part of that do you have an issue with?

      • @BigPotato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        136 months ago

        Yes but something happened after this article was written, why haven’t the time lords gone back and unmade the article so I don’t have to feel uncomfortable about the fact that this has all been going on for a long time and the world has been silent about it?

      • @Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        It’s not meant to be funny. It’s meant to be shocking and lead your outrage in a quest to disprove the core tenet, only to be forced to confront the awful element/actual reality the article was satirizing.

        The “oooof that’s hits close to home” reaction is the entire point