• @thantik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    But people need something to compare it to. They don’t know why the fediverse is something they should want.

    The email comparison is to explain that they can participate anywhere, it’s not to fundamentally portray the inner workings of it; but just to approximate it on a surface level.

    Kind of like saying “Facebook is kinda like Myspace”…it wasn’t Myspace, and we’re not asking people understand the technical differences, but there has to be some sort of starting-off point.

    I explain to people that it’s like Twitter, but if twitter acted like email where you could sign up with any provider.

    • BarqsHasBite
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Tell them it’s Social media. That’s the comparison they need. For why they might want it: it’s not controlled by a corporation.

      Ok the confusion may be that what you think is surface level is the inner working. Surface level to normal people is the user interface. The surface level of Lemmy for instance is it’s like social media. Just like the surface level of emails is “dear sir blah blah blah regards” and cc this person. You say email and they think of that surface level. Talking about how it works with intercommunication between instances like email intercommunicates is literally the inner working. And leads to the exact content of the tweet, you should reread it. Ok I’m just repeating myself so that I’m out.

      • @thantik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Signing up is the first interaction you have in order to use the site; thus my opinion that it’s surface-level. I mean, lurkers who never sign up could be considered - but I’d argue they don’t really need a federated site then.