@zephyreks@lemmy.mlM to World News@lemmy.ml • 3 months agoMexico's president says he won't fight drug cartels on US orders, calls it a 'Mexico First' policyapnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square56fedilinkarrow-up1264arrow-down14 cross-posted to: worldnewsnonus@lemy.lolworldnews@lemmit.onlineworld@lemmy.world
arrow-up1260arrow-down1external-linkMexico's president says he won't fight drug cartels on US orders, calls it a 'Mexico First' policyapnews.com@zephyreks@lemmy.mlM to World News@lemmy.ml • 3 months agomessage-square56fedilink cross-posted to: worldnewsnonus@lemy.lolworldnews@lemmit.onlineworld@lemmy.world
minus-square@undergroundoverground@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink1•edit-23 months agoI already did. You just didn’t like it and, again, declared it wouldn’t work without a hint of evidence or even any argumentation. I don’t need a magic bullet to disprove “nothing will help.” Youre just failing to realise how poor a declaration it was. Also, I never needed to prove you wrong in the first place. You never proved yourself right. You just declared it to be thus and such.
minus-square@ILikeBoobies@lemmy.calinkfedilink1•edit-23 months agoYou seem to be circling, this is frivolous I could repeat what I already said about your proof but then you will just say it again
minus-square@undergroundoverground@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink1•3 months agoAnd you can just re-drclare your baseless nonsense too. No, weaponised ignorance and a burden of proof falacy is not a cogent rebuttal and pretending it wouldn’t work either side of the boarder is desperate, at best.
Be my guest to prove me wrong then
I already did. You just didn’t like it and, again, declared it wouldn’t work without a hint of evidence or even any argumentation.
I don’t need a magic bullet to disprove “nothing will help.” Youre just failing to realise how poor a declaration it was.
Also, I never needed to prove you wrong in the first place. You never proved yourself right. You just declared it to be thus and such.
You seem to be circling, this is frivolous
I could repeat what I already said about your proof but then you will just say it again
And you can just re-drclare your baseless nonsense too.
No, weaponised ignorance and a burden of proof falacy is not a cogent rebuttal and pretending it wouldn’t work either side of the boarder is desperate, at best.