• @assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    13 months ago

    No, but he would probably say to vote for the candidate that mentions they’re open up integration vs the candidate who wants to make slavery a thing again.

    • archomrade [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23 months ago

      Except one of those candidates is in the position to take action now, but chooses not to.

            • archomrade [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              13 months ago

              “Nothing else exists outside this vote right now”

              Jesus, read a history book or something

                • archomrade [he/him]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  13 months ago

                  Sure, but what each of those candidates does is flexible, and one of those candidates can fulfill some action in that role right now.

                  And since that candidate needs our votes, we have some degree of bargaining power over what that candidate chooses to do right now and for the next 7 months.

                  • @Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    03 months ago

                    Do you?

                    If Biden doesn’t stop helping Israel, you’ll help the other guy get elected? What kind of bargain is that?

                    You’re playing with fire by threatening that. It’s a terrible, terrible gamble. If you lose, countless more people will die. Are you okay having that on your conscience?

                    This is the world’s biggest trolley problem, and you’re advocating for “don’t pull the lever even though more people will die”